From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB56DDF5A for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:55:09 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080404180333.GB26693@lixom.net> References: <20080403190943.GA16446@ru.mvista.com> <1207259436.10388.337.camel@pasglop> <20080404052955.GC11799@lixom.net> <9d19fecb0ef172995b7ce3a317ee3c0d@kernel.crashing.org> <20080404180333.GB26693@lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63defd942bd57ca87cb17334832b615c@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: MPIC ack interrupts at mpic_teardown_this_cpu() Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:55:01 +0200 To: Olof Johansson Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> platforms/maple/setup.c and platforms/powermac/pic.c use >> MPIC_WANTS_RESET. >> Is there a reason why we don't do that on every MPIC? If there is >> such >> a reason, the default should be to reset, only pseries and chrp and >> cell >> and now pasemi do not use it. It's the only sane way to get an MPIC >> into >> a sane known state starting from state. > > I used to have the reset there on pasemi but due to some other issues I > ended up taking it out. > > It's not like doing a final EOI is a big deal, I really don't see why > there's hassle about this patch. The patch is fine, don't get me wrong. I'm just saying MPIC_WANTS_RESET should be the default since pretty much everything wants it. The few platforms that don't can document why; with the current code, we cannot see if you just forgot it or not. Segher