From: Ben Menchaca <ben.menchaca@gmail.com>
To: Liu Dave-R63238 <DaveLiu@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:38:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64ac01180903052138k4226022cq840d497dccecd939@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D7CCA83BB0796C49BC0BB53B6AB1208916CF75@zch01exm21.fsl.freescale.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3182 bytes --]
1. BAT2 in linux is set to WIMG=0010, and covers all 64M
2. PEX_DEVICE_CONTROL in PCI-E Config Space (0x54): 0x1020
3. PEX_xDMA_CTRL is set to 0x00000401 at the initiation of the DMA.
4. OWAR0 is set to 0xFFFFF005, so NSNP is 0.
5. The DMA descriptor (randomly chosen when I hit a trigger...just ignore
the size...) contains 0002AFF3 at offset 0, so nosnoops are cleared.
Core is 400MHz, and CSB is 133MHz.
- Ben
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Liu Dave-R63238 <DaveLiu@freescale.com>wrote:
> and what settings is DMA description bit 3?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu=freescale.com@ozlabs.org
> > [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu <linuxppc-dev-bounces%2Bdaveliu>=
> freescale.com@ozlabs.org]
> > On Behalf Of Liu Dave-R63238
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:22 PM
> > To: Ben Menchaca; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Subject: RE: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited
> >
> > Did you enable the snoop bit at PEX_WDMA_CTRL[SNOOP] and
> > PEX_RDMA_CTRL[SNOOP]?
> >
> > What is the freq settings? CORE/CSB bus.
> >
> > Thanks, Dave
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu=freescale.com@ozlabs.org
> > [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+daveliu <linuxppc-dev-bounces%2Bdaveliu>=
> freescale.com@ozlabs.org]
> > On Behalf Of Ben Menchaca
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:33 PM
> > To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > Subject: 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited
> >
> >
> > I am working on a Freescale 8314e design, and the
> > embedded device is configured as a PCI-e endpoint running a
> > 2.6.27-5 kernel. For context, we have written a kernel
> > module which, among other things, uses the RDMA/WDMA engine
> > in the PCI-e IP block. On the host side, these DMAs are
> > coherent. However, on the embedded side, things are quite a
> > bit less rosy; we must manually flush/invalidate cache lines
> > for WDMA/RDMAs to occur successfully. After speaking with
> > (several) FAEs at Freescale, we believe there is a
> > configuration issue that is the cause, but we have yet to
> > have anyone successfully point to it.
> >
> > Disabling the data cache altogether resolves the issue
> > entirely, but of course, also completely tanks performance.
> > As a temporary workaround, I would like to simply mark the
> > pages (obtained currently via dma_alloc_coherent) involved as
> > cache-inhibited. I have attempted to do this via some
> > snippets remaining in fec.c (va_to_pte, uncache_pte to set
> > _PAGE_NO_CACHE, flush_tlb_page, then unmap_pte), but this is
> > almost certainly braindead; va_to_pte is not a part of the
> > 83xx source, as far as I can tell; 8xx only.
> >
> > A quick pointer in the correct direction for marking
> > pages as cache-inhibited on a 2.6.27-5 kernel would be
> > appreciated, or if my approach to a workaround is flawed, a
> > pointer to the correct way would be great.
> >
> > Ben Menchaca
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5138 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 4:32 83xx: Marking or Allocating Pages as Cache-Inhibited Ben Menchaca
2009-03-06 5:22 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-06 5:27 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-06 5:38 ` Ben Menchaca [this message]
2009-03-06 5:40 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-06 6:10 ` Ben Menchaca
2009-03-06 6:30 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-06 16:12 ` Ben Menchaca
2009-03-06 16:30 ` Ben Menchaca
2009-03-09 2:30 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-09 2:56 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-09 3:27 ` Ben Menchaca
2009-03-07 21:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-08 3:15 ` Ben Menchaca
2009-03-06 5:49 ` Liu Dave-R63238
2009-03-08 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2009-03-09 2:33 ` Liu Dave-R63238
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64ac01180903052138k4226022cq840d497dccecd939@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ben.menchaca@gmail.com \
--cc=DaveLiu@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox