linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: "Jan-Bernd Themann" <ossthema@de.ibm.com>
Cc: themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	tklein@linux.ibm.com, Andre Detsch <adetsch@br.ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix delayed packet processing
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:45:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6663.1276620347@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006151735.17258.ossthema@de.ibm.com>

Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@de.ibm.com> wrote:

>In the eHEA poll function an rmb() is required. Without that some packets
>on the receive queue are not seen and thus delayed until the next interrupt
>is handled for the same receive queue.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>

	To add a bit of background, this could manifest during a netperf
TCP_RR or UDP_RR on an otherwise idle network.  TCP would occasionally
retransmit, but then both the original segment and the retransmission
would simultaneously appear at the receiver.  For UDP_RR, message sizes
in excess of the mtu would occasionally "lose" an IP fragment, and
eventually IP reassembly would time out.

	-J

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>


>---
>Patch created against 2.6.35-rc3
>
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |    1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>index f547894..fd890fa 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>@@ -867,6 +867,7 @@ static int ehea_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> 		ehea_reset_cq_ep(pr->send_cq);
> 		ehea_reset_cq_n1(pr->recv_cq);
> 		ehea_reset_cq_n1(pr->send_cq);
>+		rmb();
> 		cqe = ehea_poll_rq1(pr->qp, &wqe_index);
> 		cqe_skb = ehea_poll_cq(pr->send_cq);
>
>-- 
>1.7.0
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-15 15:35 [PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix delayed packet processing Jan-Bernd Themann
2010-06-15 16:45 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2010-06-17  1:05   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6663.1276620347@death.nxdomain.ibm.com \
    --to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=adetsch@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=themann@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tklein@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).