RE: Unhandled interrupt 0, disabled

RE: Unhandled interrupt 0, disabled

[Jean-Denis Boyer]

Mr. Ferri,

> Which fix are you standing behind your __sti()
> fix using the sync or the 2.4.18 patch ?

Just put the 'sync' in __sti().
It seems to fix the problem on both 2.4.10 and 2.4.18,
which are the versions I have tested.

> I am using the B.3 version of the 8260
Thank you for the information!

--------------------------------------------
 Jean-Denis Boyer, B.Eng., System Architect
 Mediatrix Telecom Inc.
 4229 Garlock Street
 Sherbrooke (Québec)
 J1L 2C8  CANADA
 (819)829-8749 x241
--------------------------------------------

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

RE: Unhandled interrupt 0, disabled

[Allen Curtis]

> Just put the 'sync' in __sti().
> It seems to fix the problem on both 2.4.10 and 2.4.18,
> which are the versions I have tested.
>
> > I am using the B.3 version of the 8260

I know that this is unrelated but could you confirm whether B.3 and higher
fixes the CP hang problem when using an external PCI controller such as the
PowerSpan.

Thanks


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re[2]: Unhandled interrupt 0, disabled

[Ricardo Scop]

Mr. Jean-Denis,

I think I forgot to feed you back about that fix. We have a 8255,
1K22A mask, with linux 2.4.16, and the fix worked well, thanks!

-- Scop                            mailto:scop@vanet.com.br

------------------------------------------------------------------
"We all lie in the gutter, but some of us look up at the stars."
-- Oscar Wilde

Friday, May 03, 2002, 12:22:00 PM, you wrote:

>> Which fix are you standing behind your __sti()
>> fix using the sync or the 2.4.18 patch ?

JDB> Just put the 'sync' in __sti().
JDB> It seems to fix the problem on both 2.4.10 and 2.4.18,
JDB> which are the versions I have tested.

>> I am using the B.3 version of the 8260

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/