From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from exprod5og113.obsmtp.com (exprod5og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.0.26]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C74D9B713B for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:17:14 +1000 (EST) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so961475qwj.24 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:17:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Tirumala Marri References: <20100909004853.GA11808@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <49073d172310031addb3aa7d08a60c99@mail.gmail.com> <20100909063601.03CCE1506AA@gemini.denx.de> <56886bb653a2198b7a5bdcf5f38d4a98@mail.gmail.com> <20100909130954.265adb37@lappy.seanm.ca> In-Reply-To: <20100909130954.265adb37@lappy.seanm.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:17:10 -0700 Message-ID: <69da3260c595cc3870a9ff1eee9a7898@mail.gmail.com> Subject: RE: Combining defconfigs for 44x based boards To: Sean MacLennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wolfgang Denk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:49:14 -0700 > Tirumala Marri wrote: > > > [Marri] Great we already have it. We should remove the defconfigs > > under 44x then ? > > I'd rather we didn't. I thought Linus' beef was over the churn in the > defconfigs, not the fact that they exist. The 44x defconfigs change > very rarely. [Marri]That is kind of true. Can we create new defconfigs then ? I am trying to check-in new defconfig.