From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA556C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A68D60E0C for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:34:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1A68D60E0C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HTdRz3qMLz3bfv for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:34:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=115.124.30.44; helo=out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com; envelope-from=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HTdRR1qFvz2yM7 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:33:36 +1100 (AEDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R121e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04400; MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=31; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0Ure8YWn_1634096007; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Ure8YWn_1634096007) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:33:29 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling To: Steven Rostedt References: <8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com> <1a8e8d73-b508-f90b-0d82-eb2da45a720e@linux.alibaba.com> <20211012232658.7dac3f43@oasis.local.home> From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= Message-ID: <69e9cf98-883c-0016-4b07-12afbf138094@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:33:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211012232658.7dac3f43@oasis.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Paul Walmsley , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Guo Ren , Jisheng Zhang , "H. Peter Anvin" , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Miroslav Benes , Paul Mackerras , Joe Lawrence , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Petr Mladek , Albert Ou , Jiri Kosina , Nicholas Piggin , Borislav Petkov , Josh Poimboeuf , Thomas Gleixner , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Masami Hiramatsu , Colin Ian King , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2021/10/13 上午11:26, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Please start a new thread when sending new versions. v2 should not be a > reply to v1. If you want to reference v1, just add it to the cover > letter with a link tag: > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com/ Ok, I'll resend it with link then. Regards, Michael Wang > > -- Steve > > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:16:56 +0800 > ηŽ‹θ΄‡ wrote: > >> The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using smp_processor_id() >> with preemption enabled, all the checking on CPU could be wrong after preemption. >> >> As Peter point out, the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() >> pair require the preemption to be disabled as 'Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst' >> explained, but currently the work is done outside of the helpers. >> >> Patch 1/2 will make sure preemption disabled after trylock() succeed, >> patch 2/2 will do smp_processor_id() checking after trylock to address the >> issue. >> >> Michael Wang (2): >> ftrace: disable preemption between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() >> ftrace: do CPU checking after preemption disabled >> >> arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c | 2 -- >> arch/parisc/kernel/ftrace.c | 2 -- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 2 -- >> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/ftrace.c | 2 -- >> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 2 -- >> include/linux/trace_recursion.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- >> kernel/livepatch/patch.c | 6 ------ >> kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 6 +++--- >> kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 5 ----- >> 9 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >>