linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephane Marchesin" <marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: henrik.sorensen@gmail.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:39:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a89f9d50802060639j4b3a8b7u4e4e596b010ee353@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1166362145.6714.53.camel@pmac.infradead.org>

On 12/17/06, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> You still get to 'accidentally' do 64-bit arithmetic in-kernel that way
> though. Might be better just to provide __ucmpdi2, just as we have for
> the other functions which are required from libgcc
>
> It'd be better just to fix the compiler though -- which is in fact what
> they've done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25724
>               http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237
>
> I've applied this as a temporary hack to the Fedora kernel until the
> compiler is updated there...
>

Hello,

We're hitting this i nouveau as well (http://nouveau.freedesktop.org),
since we make extensive use ot 64 bit ints. Over time, we've had a
number of reports on this issue, and at one point I read that it
should be fixed in gcc. But recently, a nouveau user on PPC32 (Henrik
in CC:) reported the issue again with gcc 4.2.3. Others have it on gcc
4.2.2 too:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547

So, the point of this email is to ask about the possibility of merging
in one of the __ucmpdi2 patches, like David's which is kept below for
reference. Most distros seem to ship with such a patch already, and it
seems that other drivers hit this as well.

Thanks,
Stephane


> --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S~     2006-11-29 21:57:37.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S      2006-12-17 12:19:48.000000000 +0000
> @@ -728,6 +728,27 @@ _GLOBAL(__lshrdi3)
>         or      r4,r4,r7        # LSW |= t2
>         blr
>
> +/*
> + * __ucmpdi2: 64-bit comparison
> + *
> + * R3/R4 has 64 bit value A
> + * R5/R6 has 64 bit value B
> + * result in R3: 0 for A < B
> + *              1 for A == B
> + *              2 for A > B
> + */
> +_GLOBAL(__ucmpdi2)
> +       cmplw   r7,r3,r5        # compare high words
> +       li      r3,0
> +       blt     r7,2f           # a < b ... return 0
> +       bgt     r7,1f           # a > b ... return 2
> +       cmplw   r6,r4,r6        # compare low words
> +       blt     r6,2f           # a < b ... return 0
> +       li      r3,1
> +       ble     r6,2f           # a = b ... return 1
> +1:     li      r3,2
> +2:     blr
> +
>  _GLOBAL(abs)
>         srawi   r4,r3,31
>         xor     r3,r3,r4
> --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c~   2006-12-15 17:19:56.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c    2006-12-17 12:16:54.000000000 +0000
> @@ -161,9 +161,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_tm);
>  long long __ashrdi3(long long, int);
>  long long __ashldi3(long long, int);
>  long long __lshrdi3(long long, int);
> +int __ucmpdi2(uint64_t, uint64_t);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2);
>  #endif
>
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy);
>
> --
> dwmw2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-06 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.SOC.4.61.0612131359430.10721@math.ut.ee>
     [not found] ` <1166053317.909.19.camel@praia>
     [not found]   ` <20061214195842.GA14041@athena.road.mcmartin.ca>
2006-12-17 13:29     ` V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc David Woodhouse
2008-02-06 14:39       ` Stephane Marchesin [this message]
2008-03-02 18:48         ` Stephane Marchesin
2008-03-02 21:53         ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-04 16:37           ` David Woodhouse
2008-03-04 16:58             ` Scott Wood
2008-03-04 20:32             ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-04 21:44           ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-04 21:47             ` Scott Wood
2008-03-04 22:43             ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a89f9d50802060639j4b3a8b7u4e4e596b010ee353@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=henrik.sorensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).