From: Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the powerpc-objtool tree
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:43:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cdad32e-782d-5bb5-f7e9-a44fb0b6444d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125143012.6426c2b9@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi all,
On 25/11/22 09:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the powerpc-objtool tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> pseries_le_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_first_256B(): can't find starting instruction
> arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.o: warning: objtool: optprobe_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
>
> I have no idea what started this (they may have been there yesterday).
I was able to recreate the above mentioned warnings with
pseries_le_defconfig and powernv_defconfig. The regression report also
mentions a warning
(https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202211282102.QUr7HHrW-lkp@intel.com/)
seen with arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S assembly file.
[1] arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.o: warning: objtool:
optprobe_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
[2] arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.o: warning: objtool:
kvm_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
[3] arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_first_256B():
can't find starting instruction
The warnings [1] and [2] go away after adding 'nop' instruction. Below
diff fixes it for me:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
index cd4e7bc32609..ea4e3bd82f4f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
@@ -134,3 +134,4 @@ optprobe_template_ret:
.global optprobe_template_end
optprobe_template_end:
+ nop
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
index 7af6f8b50c5d..41fd664e3ba0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
@@ -352,3 +352,4 @@ kvm_tmp_end:
.global kvm_template_end
kvm_template_end:
+ nop
For warning [3], objtool is throwing can't find starting instruction
warning because it finds that the symbol (end_first_256B) is zero sized,
and such symbols are not added to the rbtree. I tried to fix it by
adding a 'nop' instruction (pasted diff below), but that resulted in a
kernel build failure.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
index 874efd25cc45..d48850fe159f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ __secondary_hold:
EMIT_BUG_ENTRY 0b, __FILE__, __LINE__, 0
#endif
CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(first_256B)
+nop
/*
* On server, we include the exception vectors code here as it
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
index 26f8fef53c72..f7517d443e9b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
@@ -3104,9 +3104,13 @@ __end_interrupts:
DEFINE_FIXED_SYMBOL(__end_interrupts, virt_trampolines)
CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(real_vectors);
+nop
CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(real_trampolines);
+nop
CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(virt_vectors);
+nop
CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(virt_trampolines);
+nop
USE_TEXT_SECTION()
I'm not very sure on how to address this particular warning
(arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_first_256B():
can't find starting instruction). Given that there are no calls to
_mcount, one workaround is to skip objtool from running on
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o file. The below diff works for me:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
index 9b6146056e48..9ef6a040d875 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -219,3 +219,5 @@ $(obj)/vdso64_wrapper.o : $(obj)/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
# for cleaning
subdir- += vdso
+
+OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_head_64.o := y
Thanks,
Sathvika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 3:30 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the powerpc-objtool tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-29 15:13 ` Sathvika Vasireddy [this message]
2022-11-29 15:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-30 11:51 ` Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-12-06 10:14 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cdad32e-782d-5bb5-f7e9-a44fb0b6444d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).