From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Optimize disable path
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e7c6054-b152-40db-c7d3-89901949460f@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190618042732.5582-5-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Le 18/06/2019 à 06:27, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
> Directly setting dawr and dawrx with 0 should be enough to
> disable watchpoint. No need to reset individual bits in
> variable and then set in hw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 78202d5fb13a..8acbbdd4a2d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
> /* Note: Don't change the the first 6 bits below as they are in the same order
> * as the dabr and dabrx.
> */
> +#define HW_BRK_TYPE_DISABLE 0x00
I'd rather call it HW_BRK_TYPE_NONE
> #define HW_BRK_TYPE_READ 0x01
> #define HW_BRK_TYPE_WRITE 0x02
> #define HW_BRK_TYPE_TRANSLATE 0x04
> @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ static inline void hw_breakpoint_disable(void)
> struct arch_hw_breakpoint brk;
>
> brk.address = 0;
> - brk.type = 0;
> + brk.type = HW_BRK_TYPE_DISABLE;
> brk.len = 0;
> if (ppc_breakpoint_available())
> __set_breakpoint(&brk);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index f002d2ffff86..265fac9fb3a4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -793,10 +793,22 @@ static inline int set_dabr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> return __set_dabr(dabr, dabrx);
> }
>
> +static int disable_dawr(void)
> +{
> + if (ppc_md.set_dawr)
> + return ppc_md.set_dawr(0, 0);
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_DAWRX, 0);
And SPRN_DAWR ?
The above code looks pretty similar to the one at the end of set_dawr().
You should factorise it, for instance
static int __set_dawr(int dawr, int dawrx)
{
if (ppc_md.set_dawr)
return ppc_md.set_dawr(dawr, dawrx);
mtspr(SPRN_DAWR, dawr);
mtspr(SPRN_DAWRX, dawrx);
return 0;
}
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int set_dawr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> {
> unsigned long dawr, dawrx, mrd;
>
> + if (brk->type == HW_BRK_TYPE_DISABLE)
> + return disable_dawr();
Then replace by __set_dawr(0, 0);
> +
> dawr = brk->address;
>
> dawrx = (brk->type & HW_BRK_TYPE_RDWR) << (63 - 58);
>
And use the new helper at the end of the function too.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-18 4:27 [PATCH 0/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Fixes plus Code refactor Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 4:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Replace stale do_dabr() with do_break() Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:02 ` Michael Neuling
2019-06-18 6:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-18 4:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Refactor hw_breakpoint_arch_parse() Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:21 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-18 7:10 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 4:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Refactor set_dawr() Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:11 ` Michael Neuling
2019-06-18 7:13 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-18 4:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Optimize disable path Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:15 ` Michael Neuling
2019-06-19 6:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:31 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2019-06-19 6:14 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 4:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-19 6:51 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 13:32 ` Michael Neuling
2019-06-19 7:45 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-06-18 6:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] Powerpc/hw-breakpoint: Fixes plus Code refactor Christophe Leroy
2019-06-18 6:17 ` Michael Neuling
2019-06-19 7:47 ` Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e7c6054-b152-40db-c7d3-89901949460f@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).