From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20051116194553.GA23679@iram.es> References: <1132032910.23979.6.camel@gaston> <00eecfdbd5bccc7b293d847033121eee@freescale.com> <20051116093609.GA26269@iram.es> <43D0A21D-89BC-4EFE-BA2A-94760BA32276@kernel.crashing.org> <755b1bfb034aebb5de36dc0594e08ec6@embeddededge.com> <20051116194553.GA23679@iram.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6ebdb3aa72b262f31fd89bfc747c9d81@embeddededge.com> From: Dan Malek Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:36:40 -0500 To: Gabriel Paubert Cc: linuxppc64-dev , linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Merge align.c List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 16, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > I originally asked because I believed that these cores are > actually closer to the 603e than to the original 603. That's correct. In fact, I think the original 8260 and perhaps the 5200 were 603e cores. As I mentioned, the newer ones are subtly different, but better than the 603e ;-) Thanks. -- Dan