linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	alistair@popple.id.au, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] cxl: Mark context requiring global TLBIs
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 12:41:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f269c40-c72a-8415-21e1-058c91a43f6b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493883553.7934.5.camel@gmail.com>



Le 04/05/2017 à 09:39, Balbir Singh a écrit :
> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:29 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>> The PSL needs to see all TLBI pertinent to the memory contexts used on
>> the cxl adapter. For the hash memory model, it was done by making all
>> TLBIs global as soon as the cxl driver is in us. For radix, we need
>> something similar, but we can refine and only convert to global the
>> invalidations for contexts actually used by the device.
>>
>> So mark the contexts being attached to the cxl adapter as requiring
>> global TLBIs.
>>
> <snip>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>> +	if (ctx->mm)
>> +		mm_context_set_global_tlbi(&ctx->mm->context);
>
> Just curious and wondering
>
> Could we do mm_context_set_global_tlbi() before ->attach_process() that
> way we won't need atomic tests (set_bit() and test_bit())? May be a memory
> barrier would suffice. Not 100% sure, hence checking


You're right, I need to move mm_context_set_global_tlbi() before the 
attach and have a write memory barrier.
If the attach fails, then the context will still be marked for global 
TLBIs (some other driver may also set the bit for a different reason). 
But I would expect the life expectancy of a process designed to use an 
accelerator and failing to attach to be pretty short.

I still think we need the atomic set_bit() though, but that's really for 
the future and if somebody introduces new bits in the context 'flags'.

   Fred


> Balbir Singh.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-07 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-03 14:29 [RFC 0/2] powerpc/mm: Mark memory contexts requiring global TLBIs Frederic Barrat
2017-05-03 14:29 ` [RFC 1/2] powerpc/mm: Add marker for contexts requiring global TLB invalidations Frederic Barrat
2017-05-04  6:41   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-05-04 17:24     ` Frederic Barrat
2017-05-04  7:25   ` Balbir Singh
2017-05-04  9:24     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-05-04  9:42   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-05-07 11:15     ` Frederic Barrat
2017-05-03 14:29 ` [RFC 2/2] cxl: Mark context requiring global TLBIs Frederic Barrat
2017-05-04  7:39   ` Balbir Singh
2017-05-07 10:41     ` Frederic Barrat [this message]
2017-05-05  5:28 ` [RFC 0/2] powerpc/mm: Mark memory contexts " Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f269c40-c72a-8415-21e1-058c91a43f6b@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).