From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de,
Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>, Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
"Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 20:13:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7137972e-bc7a-432c-94be-755ba9029d8c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250826094358.GG3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter.
Looking at this,
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/commit/?h=sched/core&id=9d710c5b2bb37cedf5f09ce988884fb5795e1a76
>
> WDYT?
>
> ---
> Kconfig | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arm/Kconfig | 18 ++----------------
> arm64/Kconfig | 26 +++-----------------------
> loongarch/Kconfig | 19 ++-----------------
> mips/Kconfig | 16 ++--------------
> parisc/Kconfig | 9 +--------
> powerpc/Kconfig | 15 +++------------
> riscv/Kconfig | 9 +--------
> s390/Kconfig | 8 ++------
> sparc/Kconfig | 20 ++------------------
> x86/Kconfig | 27 ++++-----------------------
> 11 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -41,6 +41,44 @@ config HOTPLUG_SMT
> config SMT_NUM_THREADS_DYNAMIC
> bool
>
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT
> + bool
> +
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER
> + bool
> +
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
> + bool
> +
> +config SCHED_SMT
> + bool "SMT (Hyperthreading) scheduler support"
> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT
> + default y
> + help
> + Improves the CPU scheduler's decision making when dealing with
> + MultiThreading at a cost of slightly increased overhead in some
> + places. If unsure say N here.
> +
> +config SCHED_CLUSTER
> + bool "Cluster scheduler support"
> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER
> + default y
> + help
> + Cluster scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> + making when dealing with machines that have clusters of CPUs.
> + Cluster usually means a couple of CPUs which are placed closely
> + by sharing mid-level caches, last-level cache tags or internal
> + busses.
> +
> +config SCHED_MC
> + bool "Multi-Core Cache (MC) scheduler support"
> + depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
> + default y
> + help
> + Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> + making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly
> + increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
> +
> # Selected by HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_DEAD or HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL
> config HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC
...
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_STACKWALK
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC if PPC_BOOK3S || PPC_8xx
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if PPC64 && SMP
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if PPC64 && SMP
> + select SCHED_MC if ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
Wondering if this SCHED_MC is necessary here? shouldn't it be set by arch/Kconfig?
nit: Also, can we have so they are still sorted?
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if PPC64 && SMP
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if PPC64 && SMP
> select ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF if PPC64
> select ARCH_USE_MEMTEST
> @@ -963,18 +966,6 @@ config PPC_PROT_SAO_LPAR
> config PPC_COPRO_BASE
> bool
>
> -config SCHED_SMT
> - bool "SMT (Hyperthreading) scheduler support"
> - depends on PPC64 && SMP
> - help
> - SMT scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision making
> - when dealing with POWER5 cpus at a cost of slightly increased
> - overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
> -
> -config SCHED_MC
> - def_bool y
> - depends on PPC64 && SMP
> -
> config PPC_DENORMALISATION
> bool "PowerPC denormalisation exception handling"
> depends on PPC_BOOK3S_64
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config RISCV
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK if MMU
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SHADOW_CALL_STACK if HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if SMP
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF if 64BIT
> select ARCH_USE_MEMTEST
> select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
> @@ -453,14 +454,6 @@ config SMP
>
> If you don't know what to do here, say N.
>
> -config SCHED_MC
> - bool "Multi-core scheduler support"
> - depends on SMP
> - help
> - Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> - making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly
> - increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
> -
> config NR_CPUS
> int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-512)"
> depends on SMP
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -547,15 +547,11 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
> depends on NUMA
> default "1"
>
> -config SCHED_SMT
> - def_bool n
> -
> -config SCHED_MC
> - def_bool n
> -
> config SCHED_TOPOLOGY
> def_bool y
> prompt "Topology scheduler support"
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
> select SCHED_SMT
> select SCHED_MC
Same here. Above two are needed?
> help
> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ config SPARC64
> select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
> select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if SMP
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if SMP
>
> config ARCH_PROC_KCORE_TEXT
> def_bool y
> @@ -288,24 +290,6 @@ if SPARC64 || COMPILE_TEST
> source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
> endif
>
> -config SCHED_SMT
> - bool "SMT (Hyperthreading) scheduler support"
> - depends on SPARC64 && SMP
> - default y
> - help
> - SMT scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision making
> - when dealing with SPARC cpus at a cost of slightly increased overhead
> - in some places. If unsure say N here.
> -
> -config SCHED_MC
> - bool "Multi-core scheduler support"
> - depends on SPARC64 && SMP
> - default y
> - help
> - Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> - making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly
> - increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
> -
> config CMDLINE_BOOL
> bool "Default bootloader kernel arguments"
> depends on SPARC64
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -330,6 +330,10 @@ config X86
> imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT if EFI
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM if X86_64
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if SMP
> + select SCHED_SMT if SMP
Is this SCHED_SMT needed here?
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER if SMP
> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if SMP
>
> config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
> def_bool y
> @@ -1036,29 +1040,6 @@ config NR_CPUS
> This is purely to save memory: each supported CPU adds about 8KB
> to the kernel image.
>
> -config SCHED_CLUSTER
> - bool "Cluster scheduler support"
> - depends on SMP
> - default y
> - help
> - Cluster scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> - making when dealing with machines that have clusters of CPUs.
> - Cluster usually means a couple of CPUs which are placed closely
> - by sharing mid-level caches, last-level cache tags or internal
> - busses.
> -
> -config SCHED_SMT
> - def_bool y if SMP
> -
> -config SCHED_MC
> - def_bool y
> - prompt "Multi-core scheduler support"
> - depends on SMP
> - help
> - Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> - making when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly
> - increased overhead in some places. If unsure say N here.
> -
> config SCHED_MC_PRIO
> bool "CPU core priorities scheduler support"
> depends on SCHED_MC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 4:13 [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-28 23:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] powerpc/smp: Rename cpu_corgroup_* to cpu_corgrp_* K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-01 3:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] powerpc/smp: Export cpu_coregroup_mask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-28 14:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-09-01 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-14 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 12:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-14 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 15:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-08-26 9:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 4:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_smt_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_cls_mask() across core and x86 K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_mc_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_pkg_mask() " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() Shrikanth Hegde
2025-08-26 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-29 7:53 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-08-29 8:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 4:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-01 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 17:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7137972e-bc7a-432c-94be-755ba9029d8c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).