From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0C8DDF14 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:30:36 +1000 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k40so255786ugc for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <720399a30706271930i6a45cbbbsb847dc2dd732ca5c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:30:33 -0700 From: "Bhupender Saharan" To: "Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh)" Subject: Re: ARCH=ppc or ARCH=powerpc In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_32020_15736639.1182997833936" References: Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------=_Part_32020_15736639.1182997833936 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, All the new development is happening in arch/powerpc architecure. So it is good to use this architecure if you are upgrading the kernel. But it might not work with kernel 1.1.2, As arch/powerpc need a structure like open firmware for the parameters. If you want to stick to 1.1.2 u-boot version then you shall use arch/ppc architecure. Regards Bhupi On 6/27/07, Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh) wrote: > > Hi All, > Sorry for asking this question again, I am still not clear on some of the > issues. > Background: > We have developed a custom board based on Freescale reference board: > MPC8555_CDS with MPC8541E processor running Linux 2.6.11 and uboot 1.1.2version. > > I would like to update the Linux kernel to the latest available kernel > 2.6.21. > Here are my questions: > 1- Should I use ARCH=ppc or ARCH=powerpc to build the kernel? > 2- I have seen similar filenames under arch/ppc and arch/powerpc, which > one applies to MPC8541E? > 3- Once I build the kernel, could I load the kernel with uboot version > 1.1.2 or not? if not what I should do? > > Many thanks in advance, > Bizhan > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > ------=_Part_32020_15736639.1182997833936 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

All the new development is happening in arch/powerpc  architecure. So it is good to use this architecure if you are upgrading the kernel. But it might not work with kernel 1.1.2, As arch/powerpc need a structure like open firmware for the parameters.


If you want to stick to 1.1.2 u-boot version then you shall use arch/ppc architecure.

Regards
Bhupi
 

On 6/27/07, Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh) <bgholikh@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for asking this question again, I am still not clear on some of the issues.
Background:
We have developed a custom board based on Freescale reference board: MPC8555_CDS with MPC8541E processor running Linux 2.6.11 and uboot 1.1.2 version.
 
I would like to update the Linux kernel to the latest available kernel 2.6.21.
Here are my questions:
1- Should I use ARCH=ppc or ARCH=powerpc to build the kernel?
2- I have seen similar filenames under arch/ppc and arch/powerpc, which one applies to MPC8541E?
3- Once I build the kernel, could I load the kernel with uboot version 1.1.2 or not? if not what I should do?
 
Many thanks in advance,
Bizhan
 

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

------=_Part_32020_15736639.1182997833936--