Recommended kernel version/tree for use with MPC8555E?

Recommended kernel version/tree for use with MPC8555E?

[Kylo Ginsberg]

I've just started working on s/w for an 8555E-based board.  On the 8555E 
I will be using the TSECs (Gigabit ethernet interfaces), DMA engines, 
the security engine, UARTs, DDR and Local Bus controllers and that's 
about it.

Right now I've got an MPC8560ADS eval board to test against.  This board 
came with a 2.4.26-based kernel; it boots ok and runs the basic apps 
fine, however I haven't yet had an opportunity to exercise the wide 
array of functionality on the chip, so I don't know what gotchas or 
porting difficulties I might meet ahead.

Based on that, what kernel version/tree would you recommend?  Should I 
stick with what I've got, move to a ppc-specific 2.4 tree, or jump to 
2.6.x?  Are there performance/features vs. stability tradeoffs I should 
be warned of?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts you may have.

Kylo

Re: Recommended kernel version/tree for use with MPC8555E?

[Kumar Gala]

Kylo,

All active development for PPC (including the MPCE8555E) is being done=20=

in 2.6 only at this point.  I would recommend using 2.6.11 as a=20
starting point.  Any code to support new features of the MPC8555E will=20=

be developed for 2.6 at this point.

The 2.6.11 tree has support for both the MPC8560 ADS board=20
(mpc8560_ads_defconfig) and the MPC8555 CDS board=20
(mpc8555_cds_defconfig).  Those should be good starting points for any=20=

work you are doing.

- kumar

On Mar 8, 2005, at 6:01 PM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote:

> I've just started working on s/w for an 8555E-based board.=A0 On the=20=

> 8555E
> I will be using the TSECs (Gigabit ethernet interfaces), DMA engines,
> the security engine, UARTs, DDR and Local Bus controllers and that's
> about it.
>
> Right now I've got an MPC8560ADS eval board to test against.=A0 This=20=

> board
> came with a 2.4.26-based kernel; it boots ok and runs the basic apps
>  fine, however I haven't yet had an opportunity to exercise the wide
> array of functionality on the chip, so I don't know what gotchas or
> porting difficulties I might meet ahead.
>
> Based on that, what kernel version/tree would you recommend?=A0 Should =
I
> stick with what I've got, move to a ppc-specific 2.4 tree, or jump to
> 2.6.x?=A0 Are there performance/features vs. stability tradeoffs I =
should
> be warned of?
>
> Thanks in advance for any thoughts you may have.
>
> Kylo
>  _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
>  Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded