From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from penguin.netx4.com (embeddededge.com [209.113.146.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D18D67A6C for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 10:00:52 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <72ea00c21943f86d32f1a46a62ebc367@embeddededge.com> From: Dan Malek Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:00:39 -0400 To: Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [26-devel] v2.6 performance slowdown on MPC8xx: Measuring TLB cache misses List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Apr 23, 2005, at 7:51 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > hmm, I have more than 24MB of memory and I can run CONFIG_PIN_TLB just > fine with modules off in kernel 2.4. Havn't tried 2.6 yet. Doh. Oh, I see. We only do the optimization for the instruction misses. I'll have to take a closer look at Marcelo's 2.6 tests. -- Dan