From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: adubey@linux.ibm.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:10:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734fe885-ccb1-43c9-b3e4-50615926258e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611153826.31187-4-adubey@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/06/26 9:08 pm, adubey@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Ensure that the trampoline stubs JITed at the tail of the
> epilogue do not expose the dummy trampoline address stored
> in the last 8 bytes(64-bit) and last 4 bytes(32-bit)
> to the disassembly flow. Prevent the disassembler from
> ingesting this memory address, as it may occasionally decode
> into a seemingly valid but incorrect instruction. Fix this
> issue by truncating the last 8/4 bytes from JITed buffers
> before supplying them for disassembly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c
> index 3558fe10e28c..759d6a86803c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c
> @@ -179,9 +179,11 @@ int get_jited_program_text(int fd, char *text, size_t text_sz)
> struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> __u32 jited_funcs, len, pc;
> + __u32 trunc_len = 0;
> __u32 *func_lens = NULL;
> FILE *text_out = NULL;
> uint8_t *image = NULL;
> + char *triple = NULL;
> int i, err = 0;
>
> if (!llvm_initialized) {
> @@ -225,9 +227,26 @@ int get_jited_program_text(int fd, char *text, size_t text_sz)
> if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd #2"))
> goto out;
>
> + /*
> + * last 8 bytes contains dummy_trampoline address in JIT
> + * output on 64-bit and last 4 bytes on 32-bit powerpc,
> + * which can't disassemble to a valid instruction.
> + */
> + triple = LLVMGetDefaultTargetTriple();
> + if (triple) {
> + if (strstr(triple, "powerpc64") || strstr(triple, "ppc64"))
> + trunc_len = 8;
> + else if (strstr(triple, "powerpc") || strstr(triple, "ppc"))
> + trunc_len = 4;
> + LLVMDisposeMessage(triple);
> + }
> +
> for (pc = 0, i = 0; i < jited_funcs; ++i) {
> fprintf(text_out, "func #%d:\n", i);
> - disasm_one_func(text_out, image + pc, func_lens[i]);
> + // Disabled JIT have zero func_lens, hence underflow
> + __u32 disasm_len = func_lens[i] > trunc_len ?
> + func_lens[i] - trunc_len : 0;
Following the traditional C style, declare the variable at the start
of the block and leave a blank line before the fprintf() statement.
Also, fix the comment style as noted by the bot.
> + disasm_one_func(text_out, image + pc, disasm_len);
> fprintf(text_out, "\n");
> pc += func_lens[i];
> }
- Hari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 15:38 [PATCH v7 0/7] powerpc/bpf: Add support for verifier selftest adubey
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address adubey
2026-06-13 12:34 ` Hari Bathini
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub adubey
2026-06-11 12:18 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-13 12:37 ` Hari Bathini
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure adubey
2026-06-13 12:40 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 adubey
2026-06-13 12:48 ` Hari Bathini
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall adubey
2026-06-13 12:41 ` Hari Bathini
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] selftest/bpf: Add tailcall verifier selftest for powerpc64 adubey
2026-06-13 12:42 ` Hari Bathini
2026-06-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs adubey
2026-06-13 12:44 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734fe885-ccb1-43c9-b3e4-50615926258e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adubey@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox