From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E83DDE0A
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:27:32 +1000 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <46952F11.30005@freescale.com>
References: <1184060662530-git-send-email-wei.zhang@freescale.com>
	<11840606624025-git-send-email-wei.zhang@freescale.com>
	<14A08601-B779-45BF-BC22-D1A3C9997502@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20070710161121.GA14556@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
	<22488704-4826-413B-BD18-F75C2743FB5B@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4694F7A2.6040403@freescale.com>
	<01035B4E-01EB-479A-9AA7-BCFBF6C60904@kernel.crashing.org>
	<46951EE0.6040603@freescale.com>
	<12728378-7DC8-41D9-BCF4-5F883F651E40@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4695298A.6090604@freescale.com>
	<5790B879-A6F0-4FE7-91FC-9FA812BF8231@kernel.crashing.org>
	<46952F11.30005@freescale.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <738EE0DB-8614-408C-B74A-F3C099AEA027@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add DMA sector to
	Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt file.
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:27:12 +0200
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

>>> What if the mem-to-mem channels were explicitly labelled   
>>> fsl,mpc8548-dma-mem-to-mem?
>> Why would you?  Why would you put _any_ compatible property in
>> the individual channels, even; they aren't separate devices
>> after all.
>
> They should be. :-)

But they're not, no amount of wishing or trying to discount the
shared ("master") register block will change that.


Segher