From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324D6C54FD0 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CC620714 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:05:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6CC620714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48nQJ03XXTzDqBc for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 22:05:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=rjwysocki.net (client-ip=79.96.170.134; helo=cloudserver094114.home.pl; envelope-from=rjw@rjwysocki.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl (cloudserver094114.home.pl [79.96.170.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48nPfw4ySwzDqXq for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:36:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from 185.80.35.16 (185.80.35.16) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.341) id a27912dfd0cb6c9e; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:36:18 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:36:18 +0100 Message-ID: <7394005.IE404Cl4Vv@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <87h7yexnu7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com> <1921198.IfoiWgUDIW@kreacher> <87h7yexnu7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pratik Rajesh Sampat , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dja@axtens.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:34:56 AM CET Michael Ellerman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote: > >> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame > >> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn' > >> > >> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling") > >> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat > > > > Any objections or concerns here? > > > > If not, I'll queue it up. > > I have it in my testing branch, Great! > but if you pick it up I can drop it. Let it go in through your tree. Cheers!