From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A5E10085A for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:12:33 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4B0C2115.3010006@yahoo.es> References: <1258927311-4340-1-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-2-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-3-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-4-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-5-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-6-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-7-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-8-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-9-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <1258927311-4340-10-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es> <4B0C2115.3010006@yahoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <73FCDEB3-3C1D-41F8-9CC3-D28D404E560B@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/19] powerpc: gamecube/wii: udbg support for usbgecko Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:19:16 +0100 To: Albert Herranz Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>> + If you say yes to this option, support will be included >>> for the >>> + USB Gecko adapter as an udbg console. >>> + The USB Gecko is a EXI to USB Serial converter that can be >>> plugged >>> + into a memcard slot in the Nintendo GameCube/Wii. >> >> Not "a" memcard slot, only the first one, you have it hardcoded. >> > > No. It's not hardcoded in the code. It's specified in the device > tree source. > The hardcoded one is just the early udbg, not the "normal" udbg. Ah I misread the code then. >> Surely there is something called something like >> of_node_is_compatible() >> you can use here? You already have the node pointer, there is no >> need >> to look at all other nodes. >> > > I see the point. > I didn't find of_node_is_compatible() but I'll look what's > available here. int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device, const char *compat) Segher