From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524ADDDE07 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 19:05:30 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080501043737.892888612@au1.ibm.com> References: <20080501042949.237603158@au1.ibm.com> <20080501043737.892888612@au1.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <742b5895cdf9b898ec2b4834926a41ac@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] [POWERPC] Move device_to_mask() to dma-mapping.h Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:04:30 +0200 To: markn@au1.ibm.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Move device_to_mask() to dma-mapping.h because we need to use it from > outside dma_64.c in a later patch. Why does this need to become an inline function? Segher