From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D2CBB7099 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:59:20 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF9ADDD01 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:59:19 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <74BA64FD-0DFF-45A2-868D-A001D9BA496F@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1248310415.3367.22.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:59:08 -0500 References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> <1248310415.3367.22.camel@pasglop> Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux-Arch , Linux Memory Management , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linus Torvalds List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 09:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? >>> (IE. so >>> far nobody objected to the patch itself) >> >> Maybe you can put it as a separate branch in -next, and have it >> merged >> before the stuff that depends on it, and then just sending it to me >> (as a >> git branch or patch or whatever) in the first day of the merge >> window? > > Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so > I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my > sub-maintainers to also pull from that other branch first :-) Can you not cherry pick it into powerpc-next to 'pull it through'? - k