LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-sched@vger.kernel.org>, <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 21:46:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75179ee2-ec20-4757-8631-79b1f304c366@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bca40921-d351-4439-ae6a-9e5294f23e2e@intel.com>

Hello Chenyu, Venkat,

On 5/25/2026 9:05 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 3467f86fd78f..cf6c2e4190ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1042,11 +1042,6 @@ static const struct cpumask *tl_smallcore_smt_mask(struct sched_domain_topology_
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> -struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> -{
> -       return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
> -}
> -
>  static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
>  {
>         /* Coregroup identification not available on shared systems */
> @@ -1056,6 +1051,14 @@ static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
>         return coregroup_enabled;
>  }
> 
> +struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> +       if (!has_coregroup_support())
> +               return cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu);
> +> +       return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);

Interestingly, on powerpc, the MC domain doesn't have SD_SHARE_LLC flag
set but I believe there is still some benefit of keeping the tasks on
the same hemisphere?

If we are actually aiming for LLC, I think cpu_l2_cache_mask() is the
right cpumask for all cases since tl_cache_mask() also returns that
and the l2_cache_mask is set in all cases covered by update_mask_by_l2()
in the same file.

If consolidation on hemisphere is beneficial, then the above diff
looks correct.

Note: For has_coregroup_support(), with the above fix, the scheduler
side llc_id will now be based on MC domain's span which seems wrong
since it doesn't have SD_SHARE_LLC flag and might lead to other
behavioral changes now.

> +}
> +
>  static int __init init_big_cores(void)
>  {
>         int cpu;

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek



  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-25 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 14:07 [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-25 16:16   ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-05-26  3:14     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26  3:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26  4:08     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26  4:58       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26  5:53         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 14:08           ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask Chen Yu
2026-05-27  7:01             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-27 16:05               ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 18:07                 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28  4:58                   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28  9:12                     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 10:26                       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 15:54                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 15:58                   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-27 16:30               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26  5:24       ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-27  7:05         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:01           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28  6:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 16:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 11:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 13:21   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 15:06   ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 15:56   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 16:31     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:44       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-29  3:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-29  6:59   ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75179ee2-ec20-4757-8631-79b1f304c366@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sched@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox