From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-sched@vger.kernel.org>, <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 21:46:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75179ee2-ec20-4757-8631-79b1f304c366@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bca40921-d351-4439-ae6a-9e5294f23e2e@intel.com>
Hello Chenyu, Venkat,
On 5/25/2026 9:05 PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 3467f86fd78f..cf6c2e4190ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1042,11 +1042,6 @@ static const struct cpumask *tl_smallcore_smt_mask(struct sched_domain_topology_
> }
> #endif
>
> -struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> -{
> - return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
> -}
> -
> static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
> {
> /* Coregroup identification not available on shared systems */
> @@ -1056,6 +1051,14 @@ static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
> return coregroup_enabled;
> }
>
> +struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + if (!has_coregroup_support())
> + return cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu);
> +> + return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
Interestingly, on powerpc, the MC domain doesn't have SD_SHARE_LLC flag
set but I believe there is still some benefit of keeping the tasks on
the same hemisphere?
If we are actually aiming for LLC, I think cpu_l2_cache_mask() is the
right cpumask for all cases since tl_cache_mask() also returns that
and the l2_cache_mask is set in all cases covered by update_mask_by_l2()
in the same file.
If consolidation on hemisphere is beneficial, then the above diff
looks correct.
Note: For has_coregroup_support(), with the above fix, the scheduler
side llc_id will now be based on MC domain's span which seems wrong
since it doesn't have SD_SHARE_LLC flag and might lead to other
behavioral changes now.
> +}
> +
> static int __init init_big_cores(void)
> {
> int cpu;
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:07 [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-25 16:16 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 4:08 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 4:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 5:53 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 14:08 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask Chen Yu
2026-05-27 7:01 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-27 16:05 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 18:07 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 4:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 9:12 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 10:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 15:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 15:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-27 16:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 5:24 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-27 7:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 6:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 16:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 11:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 13:21 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 15:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 15:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 16:31 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-29 3:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-29 6:59 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75179ee2-ec20-4757-8631-79b1f304c366@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sched@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox