From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7192BDDE1E for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 02:04:19 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <46433EFF.6030608@freescale.com> References: <20070507182953.GH26920@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <46433EFF.6030608@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7561FE26-2779-43C9-9D0E-9D4728E89F78@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] fsl_soc: Factor fsl_get_bus_freq() out of the wdt init. Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:59:14 -0500 To: Scott Wood Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 10, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Scott Wood wrote: >>> +u32 fsl_get_bus_freq(void) >> Can we call this something more explicit, like fsl_get_sys_freq(). >> Otherwise this looks fine. > > It's bus-frequency in the device tree, not sys-frequency, and the > latter doesn't seem any more explicit to me... What about > fsl_get_csb_freq()? I suggested sys because the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx all refer to it as the system bus. (well they do with regards to setting its frequency). - k