From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9ED67B7C for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:16:24 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86EC6E02268B3D4BA41C1B0C61FB14E60B3C8335@mdcexc01.na.ops.local> References: <86EC6E02268B3D4BA41C1B0C61FB14E60B3C8335@mdcexc01.na.ops.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <76B8BEDF-4DDE-47BE-AF9D-664544AA1B4A@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: export-objs in spi Makefile broke in latest linuxppc_2_4_devel [r eposted]? Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:16:37 -0500 To: "Rowan, Chad" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Rowan, Chad wrote: > Shouldn't export-objs in drivers/spi be: > > export-objs := spi-core.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx-psc.o \ > spi-iti5200.o spi-eval.o > > instead of: > > export-objs := spi-core.o spi-algo-mpc5xxx.o spi-algo-mpc5200psc.o \ > spi-iti5200.o spi-eval.o > > I believe the spi-algo-mpc5200psc.o should be spi-algo-mpc5xxx-psc.o, > correct? Are you really serious about linuxppc_2_4_devel? I can't believe linuxppc_2_4_devel has changed in months (if not over a year). - k