From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3v8SSR3X90zDq62 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:44:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v0QGiBJ3142315 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:44:37 -0500 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 287d7xurqe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:44:36 -0500 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:44:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] ibmvnic: Fix MTU settings To: David Miller References: <1485378143-5084-1-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1485378143-5084-2-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170125.230504.215468934911959234.davem@davemloft.net> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, wvoigt@us.ibm.com, jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com From: Thomas Falcon Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:44:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170125.230504.215468934911959234.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Message-Id: <783c7683-1cc2-6128-e19c-fd2c3c16cf4b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01/25/2017 10:05 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Thomas Falcon > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:02:20 -0600 > >> In the current driver, the MTU is set to the maximum value >> capable for the backing device. This patch sets the MTU to the >> default value for a Linux net device. > Why are you doing this? > > What happens to users who depend upon the current behavior. > > They will break, and that isn't acceptable. > The current behavior was already broken. We were seeing firmware errors when sending jumbo sized packets . We plan to add proper support for jumbo sized packets as soon as possible.