From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outbound2.mail.tds.net (outbound2.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.92]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFE567BF2 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:13:43 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: <724D42AC-3DBA-4B32-8E4A-914441251470@kernel.crashing.org> <713AF674-0689-4F20-9896-70696969ED24@embeddededge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7894ACDC-00C2-4E3B-A5DA-EE4FF8CF4439@embeddededge.com> From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: RFC: qe lib code location? Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:21:38 -0400 To: Andy Fleming Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Li Yang , Kim Phillips List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Andy Fleming wrote: > My reasoning is that, should Freescale decide to release a non- > powerpc chip with a QUICC Engine, Pigs will fly someday, too, but I'm not making plans for that :-) If you are going to speculate, history shows there will more likely be yet another version of some communication engine before there will be a something other than a Power core with one. > .... Of course, all of this is pure speculation, so if > there's a good reason *not* to put it in drivers/, we should probably > just maintain the status quo. I thought I provided some reasoning, but I suspect speculation will prevail......... Thanks. -- Dan