From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A5E9C4332F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NjNVx2rCQz3c6S for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:33:45 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=V/5Cv1Vh; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=iDQJHK36; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de (client-ip=66.111.4.27; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=arnd@arndb.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=V/5Cv1Vh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=iDQJHK36; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NjNTp0Nwxz30Mn for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:32:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20595C022E; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 04:32:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Dec 2022 04:32:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1672306360; x=1672392760; bh=dQitIKz9Zv Mk4oytHD9JLdnkBzb2SNyrpGTj/IDH57g=; b=V/5Cv1VhfpH5iTFAIPNbee37+7 fGRfQGhS2cfvaoU5prjYmzEkJOixzWrHBayYA/LAbI8aGtT5NUL+owTmoaFj3n3B LJoHwRocbJtfuMEyHSx/wyanvvQ13DDzevGclpYyw7qeYNEVViTXINcAj0D9vgsh 7pfvXG5yZXolmbAG1xnYy8Ot//4tvH7LNGG1PIQsV13T27gAt8TnwFw1loQa0vbD oPcv9yAU1hrNnDzJ4hHBOxfksO9Tu+rLYKEWw8IH2L2YS5xRATHewhb6Zy3ABb5W Th9HksHzXkv0qeIqDaZbZW8EtN2KMBSeSVjD4popm9MiVXhAr8il3YStrrLA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1672306360; x=1672392760; bh=dQitIKz9ZvMk4oytHD9JLdnkBzb2 SNyrpGTj/IDH57g=; b=iDQJHK36vHwWh1wRKl4E4QER7+DQKeClUsyglmglgxkg EljL62jR2iZg18aei0CuCeH832VH529cwGFTM79QLvISe5DOGQCCaE9a5nVoNcdT vRyncomABgBeJ3SsaAqCusYLubSRqSwkWTAzvRqkgUp7P/uDuSrSC8oJAPjjHwnG Zd0Dd9LmkVGzRX1+/eSzkb96N8eNNz/u/R6Fm30nUUZjYR3EyVzLMio8jHJyXxIj iQzshYRj6uSLjiurv3YD4ZUHN8c2WtRhXRw4+fHy6C13RBukmzzaZvqF15WJiEkO SQyTebTGPXArLBywDKO2H+WZBi9s4A/HPkn50Hzk8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrieeggddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdetrhhn ugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeffheeugeetiefhgeethfejgfdtuefggeejleehjeeutefhfeeggefhkedtkeet ffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrrh hnugesrghrnhgusgdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id AA077B60086; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 04:32:39 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1185-g841157300a-fm-20221208.002-g84115730 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <78b23407-bdd0-4b1b-bf6e-ecd4c00294ab@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20221222114635.1251934-3-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> References: <20221222114635.1251934-1-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> <20221222114635.1251934-3-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 10:32:19 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Andrzej Hajda" , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] arch/arc: rename internal name __xchg to __arch_xchg Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Rodrigo Vivi , Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Dec 22, 2022, at 12:46, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > __xchg will be used for non-atomic xchg macro. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda > --- > arch/arc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 4 ++-- Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann for all the arch/*/include/asm/cmpxchg.h changes. Since these patches are all the same, and they have identical subject and description texts, I would suggest combining them into a single patch to keep the series more compact. Having them separate would allow merging the patches through the individual architecture maintainer trees, but that in turn would mean waiting longer to get it all merged, but in this case it seems way easier to go through the asm-generic tree. Arnd