From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95974C433F5 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KqfyY1YxTz3bkv for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 03:45:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=PV6iGrw6; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com (client-ip=178.60.130.6; helo=fanzine2.igalia.com; envelope-from=gpiccoli@igalia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=PV6iGrw6; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KqZ1y2LvBz2xrc for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 00:02:46 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kwZz8z1ErGu8KMfXFyk29Ho8CQRFEY51B59OF6or4Ek=; b=PV6iGrw6a2PVwUqtN4K8zn62B4 AVOvfuxpf+YqiDNw4wPls4rd7BZZRLk+DlIthCPmmpYzWeS6x1CxEGIJ+6ftYWBgJvBFfwGJOqCh5 xlyk58zJVRPZef1SLet0zp5ibM7QDVVnOlmapmbP9P5ItPWzgMAPliAvmIbKMRpx1ZzLU5PWVzzn/ sHvml72t32exF/AwwtKJVJzJexH4h9oxDHF0YV+DR3EbrkMYfXiYu6ewm7xFOm0g961CiqJr+h+xh qH6hC6fDAmncBkbOEiIY7tl+ZJgFaXJC+Qr6IL6xzP0mvIw9YmD61TykJP9krK0bs+lwyGwpmSvki syiNIcrw==; Received: from [179.113.53.197] (helo=[192.168.1.60]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1nkRCW-0007vi-1F; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:02:28 +0200 Message-ID: <79472351-c6ce-a060-ef24-f64b6dce1637@igalia.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:01:59 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] coresight: cpu-debug: Replace mutex with mutex_trylock on panic notifier Content-Language: en-US To: Suzuki K Poulose , akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220427224924.592546-10-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <3cafe4fd-8a0b-2633-44a3-2995abd6c38c@arm.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <3cafe4fd-8a0b-2633-44a3-2995abd6c38c@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 03:44:36 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, halves@canonical.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, feng.tang@intel.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, corbet@lwn.net, paulmck@kernel.org, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, Mike Leach , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, Leo Yan , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com, Mathieu Poirier , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, senozhatsky@chromium.org, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 28/04/2022 05:11, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Hi Guilherme, > [...] > How would you like to proceed with queuing this ? I am happy > either way. In case you plan to push this as part of this > series (I don't see any potential conflicts) : > > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Thanks for your review Suzuki, much appreciated! About your question, I'm not sure yet - in case the core changes would take a while (like if community find them polemic, require many changes, etc) I might split this series in 2 parts, the fixes part vs the improvements per se. Either way, a V2 is going to happen for sure, and in that moment, I'll let you know what I think it's best. But either way, any choice you prefer is fine by me as well (like if you want to merge it now or postpone to get merged in the future), this is not an urgent fix I think =) Cheers, Guilherme