From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D42E7C433F5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4K6fpD44B9z3dvm for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:29:40 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=P6Qm9QV+; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com; envelope-from=jakobkoschel@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=P6Qm9QV+; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K6fJ703tpz2xsW; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:07:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id p9so24288589ejd.6; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:07:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mpq6EOSgaJN9TDHyutZ1vk7Ts/tQX7VWZG2tuQLEVnE=; b=P6Qm9QV+tKwfj02RvG70Y6RM578oBE7xk1h9xLRDl0Phoeno/cOg2X5jGG320h7a80 51RqQzzCwbkind1CCh/PsD+YJ2xLuw3nTu9DY+Zris5SVOV1FI+8DsU52Jy5KlVydcNu G0XxThLJxiMxymk0pHTiYIUYA6Uj3RhvFK2FvOkFF3qdetV9R5zYggWzNl+ojj1OXKZf MkNjwD1Q29EHNb+3aSEEQSq9r3HlkkV49QyRIpbAEX1BAYg/I0l3VyVoctyp9PVfLMdm 3mwm8jDaSc7WWe042oo4mIB/QOs4nHzHS6+i8MWcrLd/SBvvylJKxoeMQwrp3MTt3slq 2wxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mpq6EOSgaJN9TDHyutZ1vk7Ts/tQX7VWZG2tuQLEVnE=; b=ecASsem8AS9dt02dPoyOPzQ2oiZgqprzL2tTSN7fZwCUwhEAqDuoiKh/L310rLuDVv vcmZQ7z1/n9NemNskzGuAU+8gOnu/CJ07zkQtk/txr0bMs59r/MDIKhnGawp2q1qdflU wifU0Auo3SRBFgKVeDA67dNx+bs4NkIP7qBwTN4U03LOs/lsurMcuE97XrkWto7A9aDq 5XVIi21807HjtnJlL+WHm6kAzrV/zpQlqk7WoOSqgfJw4RTWatQStw5D430eSTtlXi6Q loZKAetu6dIvbQTJJPzSMxA0L5IBLEyuz29871t/4gzsZbTHytim+IBdkJXYdZRyGSl+ BaPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dlGDudfZy5vSqGstD0SB5ZGYRhCllenVNC3813quvcURimv9j 4gdxCqnmScnXCMFAr9tqaJY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3Wj1NaKaNlFGnSPXqnbDgppea1F4wGZoXZbWDfwDJgXssQhrPLcI1GM9ROPIg4DuPtt07Tg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:248a:b0:6ce:e03c:e1df with SMTP id zg10-20020a170907248a00b006cee03ce1dfmr14689906ejb.258.1646050020495; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a02:8109:9d80:3f6c:957a:1d13:c949:d1f3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d23-20020a1709067a1700b006d0ebe4af89sm4282959ejo.20.2022.02.28.04.06.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:07:00 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr From: Jakob Koschel In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:06:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <79FCD5F4-0EBA-4E3F-8B3F-D450BBA10367@gmail.com> References: <20220228110822.491923-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> <20220228110822.491923-3-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> To: Greg KH X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:23:25 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Rasmus Villemoes , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Cristiano Giuffrida , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-arch , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." , Jason Gunthorpe , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Dan Carpenter , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Arnd Bergman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Brian Johannesmeyer , Nathan Chancellor , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Mike Rapoport Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > On 28. Feb 2022, at 12:20, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:08:18PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote: >> If the list does not contain the expected element, the value of >> list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point to a valid structure. >> To avoid type confusion in such case, the list iterator >> scope will be limited to list_for_each_entry() loop. >> >> In preparation to limiting scope of a list iterator to the list traversal >> loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element. >> Determining if an element was found is then simply checking if >> the pointer is != NULL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 6 +++-- >> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c | 17 ++++++++----- >> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++---------- >> drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 22 ++++++++++------ >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/max3420_udc.c | 11 +++++--- >> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 11 +++++--- >> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 11 +++++--- >> drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 11 +++++--- >> drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 11 +++++--- >> 9 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > The drivers/usb/ portion of this patch should be in patch 1/X, right? I kept them separate since it's a slightly different case. Using 'ptr' instead of '&ptr->other_member'. Regardless, I'll split this commit up as you mentioned. > > Also, you will have to split these up per-subsystem so that the > different subsystem maintainers can take these in their trees. Thanks for the feedback. To clarify I understand you correctly: I should do one patch set per-subsystem with every instance/(file?) fixed as a separate commit? If I understand correctly, I'll repost accordingly. > > thanks, > > greg k-h thanks, Jakob Koschel