From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C5667AC5 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:14:36 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673081427@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673081427@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7A8E2BF7-3155-4014-B035-2E677F7ADF2D@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: of_platform bus? Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:14:55 -0500 To: Li Yang-r58472 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > I noticed that there is a new bus type of_platform_bus added. > Current ppc embedded systems are using platform_device, and are > changing to use OF flat device tree structure. Does it mean that > current drivers need to be switched from platform_bus to > of_platform_bus? At some point we may look at that. However, since drivers are shared between arch/ppc and arch/powerpc we will continue to use platform_device. - k