From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9EE67A06 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:59:20 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060427194055.3EED1353A57@atlas.denx.de> References: <20060427194055.3EED1353A57@atlas.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7BC50BA2-D657-4907-94AA-DB5926F22504@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: FT u-boot shim Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:59:15 -0500 To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list" , U-Boot Users List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> How would we distinguish the bootm command that takes a blob versus >> the ones we have today? > > Arg count. For example: > > OLD: bootm > or bootm > > NEW: bootm - > or bootm do you mean a literal '-' char for the no ramdisk, but dts case? - kumar