From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8074DDEB7 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:54:54 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <11897176851400-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> References: <11897176803590-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <1189717681533-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <1189717683471-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <11897176841013-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <11897176851400-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7a05156b54e7de9c2c24a146e7826699@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] [POWERPC] Update mpc7448hpc2 device tree to be compatible for tsi109 chip Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:54:43 +0200 To: Kumar Gala Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Update mpc7448hpc2 device tree to be compatible for tsi109 chip. Do all those boards have a tsi109? If not, this patch is incorrect. If they do, is tsi109 actually backward-compatible to tsi108? That is, will a driver that knows about tsi108 only work correctly on a tsi109? Also, all those names really should have a manufacturer prefix ("XXX,..."). Segher