From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-px0-f188.google.com (mail-px0-f188.google.com [209.85.216.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77430B6F19 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:45:30 +1100 (EST) Received: by pxi26 with SMTP id 26so534572pxi.17 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:45:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B288131.2050306@in.ibm.com> References: <4B2224C7.1020908@in.ibm.com> <7b6bb4a50912152225p4f5dde13re83c439407c16eaf@mail.gmail.com> <4B288131.2050306@in.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:45:28 +0800 Message-ID: <7b6bb4a50912152245v61a7f1ebgb41f4857134f3476@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc From: Xiaotian Feng To: Sachin Sant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , Linux/PPC Development , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sachin Sant wrote: > Xiaotian Feng wrote: >> >> Does this testcase hotplug cpu 0 off? >> > > No, i don't think so. It skips cpu0 during online/offline > process. Then how could this happen ? Looks like cpu 0 is offline .... 0:mon> <4>IRQ 17 affinity broken off cpu 0 <4>IRQ 18 affinity broken off cpu 0 <4>IRQ 19 affinity broken off cpu 0 <4>IRQ 264 affinity broken off cpu 0 <4>cpu 0 (hwid 0) Ready to die... <7>clockevent: decrementer mult[83126e97] shift[32] cpu[0] > > thanks > -Sachin > > -- > > --------------------------------- > Sachin Sant > IBM Linux Technology Center > India Systems and Technology Labs > Bangalore, India > --------------------------------- > >