From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D1B679EB for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:25:26 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050516153939.6CF17C1512@atlas.denx.de> References: <20050516153939.6CF17C1512@atlas.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <7bba70c93cea3585269a98b62de4777f@freescale.com> From: Kumar Gala Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:25:19 -0500 To: "Wolfgang Denk" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Missing m8260_cpm_dpfree() List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 16, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <20050516161503.0081b1b0.ajz@cambridgebroadband.com> you=20 > wrote: > > > > I have a question about the MPC8260 dual port RAM allocation=20 > routines. > > > > In arch/ppc/8260_io/commproc.c this is a=A0 m8260_cpm_dpalloc()=20 > routine, > > but the m8260_cpm_dpfree() routine is missing.=A0 Does anybody know=20= > where > > I can find this? > > It was never implemented. > > We added this in the context of the 8xx tree, and submitted=A0 it=A0 = here > at least twice. The patches were never accepted for the publich sourc > trees,=A0 so=A0 we=A0 stopped=A0 wasting=A0 our=A0 time on this. I = think Pantelis > Antoniou (?) submitted similar code later, but I don't remember=A0 = what > happened to it. The 2.6 kernel has a better set of functions around managing cpm memory=20= based on changes from Pantelis. - kumar