From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC FIX v1 1/2] powerpc: Discover radix availability before scanning the memory nodes
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:46:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c38335d-1d4c-cc18-7704-32c4ca12b0b5@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515150321-24894-2-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/05/2018 04:35 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Currently device tree nodes for memory are scanned before the
> radix feature is discovered in mmu_early_init_devtree(). Move this
> routine ahead of scanning memory nodes so that we know if the
> guest is radix or not when scanning ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index b15bae2..079d893 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -722,6 +722,8 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
> */
> of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen_ppc, boot_command_line);
>
> + mmu_early_init_devtree();
> +
> /* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
> of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
> of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc, NULL);
> @@ -783,8 +785,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
> spinning_secondaries = boot_cpu_count - 1;
> #endif
>
> - mmu_early_init_devtree();
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
> /* Scan and build the list of machine check recoverable ranges */
> of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_recoverable_ranges, NULL);
>
I guess that will cause issues with pa-feature scanning. I don't think
we finalize cpu features/mmu features that early.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-05 11:05 [RFC FIX v1 0/2] powerpc: Fix memory unplug failure for radix guests Bharata B Rao
2018-01-05 11:05 ` [RFC FIX v1 1/2] powerpc: Discover radix availability before scanning the memory nodes Bharata B Rao
2018-01-05 11:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2018-01-05 23:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-01-08 9:16 ` Bharata B Rao
2018-01-05 11:05 ` [RFC FIX v1 2/2] powerpc: Fix memory unplug failure on radix guest Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c38335d-1d4c-cc18-7704-32c4ca12b0b5@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).