From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3549067BF0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:51:37 +1000 (EST) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x7so93680nzc for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7cb1293c0605112351y658460a0x8b793ea12004dbfc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:51:36 -0700 From: "Srinivas Murthy" To: linuxppc-dev Subject: 2.6 vs 2.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19224_20163739.1147416696767" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------=_Part_19224_20163739.1147416696767 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Wolfgang Denk has a good listing of issues to consider betn linux 2.4 vs 2.6 for ppc82xx based platforms (http://www.denx.de/wiki/Know/Linux24vs26). Would this recommendation still hold? Are there any patches, developments in this area? Thanks, _Srinivas ------=_Part_19224_20163739.1147416696767 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
 Wolfgang Denk has a good listing of issues to consider betn linu= x 2.4 vs 2.6 for ppc82xx based platforms (http://www.denx.de/wiki/Know/Linux24vs26).
 
 Would this recommendation still hold?
 
 Are there any patches, developments in this area?
 
Thanks,
_Srinivas
 
------=_Part_19224_20163739.1147416696767--