From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99A4DDF5B for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 03:05:40 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1181235084.5674.190.camel@rhino> References: <1181147415.5674.108.camel@rhino> <200706070039.51541.arnd@arndb.de> <1181232276.5674.146.camel@rhino> <63ff9dee6b212cc7908c8e1b73920ea6@kernel.crashing.org> <1181235084.5674.190.camel@rhino> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7d34ab79d774659a73db117366c4b73d@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the LPC47M192 SuperIO on the MPC8641 HPCN Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:05:34 +0200 To: Wade Farnsworth Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> I'd just hide it all, do this setup in the firmware, >> where it belongs, and don't expose the superio config >> in the device tree. > > That's a valid point. This probably could (should?) be handled by > U-boot. Yeah. One more argument for this is that _every_ possible OS would need this code executed before it runs. Segher