From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DE2C54FCB for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17522071C for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D17522071C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498jpD0PF7zDqbl for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 06:49:40 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=134.134.136.20; helo=mga02.intel.com; envelope-from=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498jl15FZyzDqZX for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 06:46:51 +1000 (AEST) IronPort-SDR: o4EXyBZdAEcBsu7YwBNSb3+V4vo9xQ+q4X/y7ykf9bbB7za9NJUEnUqzNG4df7okmHDHf3xaKl iVaV/UV+mvxg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2020 13:46:47 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 1FPnQL6/es4xgUoHTgrFqVT3I3AXYsUema1U78zXK/KuI+id6H2Hs205LGwyxPHVCesUibvwi3 cNu2FF2ILnlg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,317,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="281228044" Received: from jamesp6x-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.108.128]) ([10.254.108.128]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2020 13:46:46 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI/DPC: Allow Native DPC Host Bridges to use DPC To: "Derrick, Jonathan" , "helgaas@kernel.org" References: <1587418630-13562-1-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com> <1587418630-13562-3-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com> <0058b993-0663-7fed-ed31-cb0adf845a39@linux.intel.com> From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" Message-ID: <7e574cc1-a24b-5c4b-7d4f-3fda3f395390@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:46:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" , "Patel, Mayurkumar" , "fred@fredlawl.com" , "sbobroff@linux.ibm.com" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , "olof@lixom.net" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "oohall@gmail.com" , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "rajatja@google.com" , "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 4/23/20 8:11 AM, Derrick, Jonathan wrote: > Hi Sathyanarayanan, > > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 15:50 -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> >> On 4/20/20 2:37 PM, Jon Derrick wrote: >>> The existing portdrv model prevents DPC services without either OS >>> control (_OSC) granted to AER services, a Host Bridge requesting Native >>> AER, or using one of the 'pcie_ports=' parameters of 'native' or >>> 'dpc-native'. >>> >>> The DPC port service driver itself will also fail to probe if the kernel >>> assumes the port is using Firmware-First AER. It's a reasonable >>> expectation that a port using Firmware-First AER will also be using >>> Firmware-First DPC, however if a Host Bridge requests Native DPC, the >>> DPC driver should allow it and not fail to bind due to AER capability >>> settings. >>> >>> Host Bridges which request Native DPC port services will also likely >>> request Native AER, however it shouldn't be a requirement. This patch >>> allows ports on those Host Bridges to have DPC port services. >>> >>> This will avoid the unlikely situation where the port is Firmware-First >>> AER and Native DPC, and a BIOS or switch firmware preconfiguration of >>> the DPC trigger could result in unhandled DPC events. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 ++- >>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 3 ++- >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c >>> index 7621704..3f3106f 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c >>> @@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ static int dpc_probe(struct pcie_device *dev) >>> int status; >>> u16 ctl, cap; >>> >>> - if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(pdev) && !pcie_ports_dpc_native) >>> + if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(pdev) && !pcie_ports_dpc_native && >>> + !pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus)->native_dpc) >> Why do it in probe as well ? if host->native_dpc is not set then the >> device DPC probe it self won't happen right ? > > Portdrv only enables the interrupt and allows the probe to occur. Please check the following snippet of code (from portdrv_core.c). IIUC, pcie_device_init() will not be called if PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC is not set in capabilities. Your change in portdrv_core.c already selectively enables the PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC service based on native_dpc value. So IMO, adding native_dpc check in dpc_probe() is redundant. int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev) /* Allocate child services if any */ status = -ENODEV; nr_service = 0; for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++) { int service = 1 << i; if (!(capabilities & service)) continue; if (!pcie_device_init(dev, service, irqs[i])) nr_service++; } > > The probe itself will still fail if there's a mixed-mode _OSC > negotiated AER & DPC, due to pcie_aer_get_firmware_first returning 1 > for AER and no check for DPC. > > I don't know if such a platform will exist, but the kernel is already > wired for 'dpc-native' so it makes sense to extend it for this.. > > This transform might be more readable: > if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(pdev) && > !(pcie_ports_dpc_native || hb->native_dpc)) > > > >>> return -ENOTSUPP; >>> >>> status = devm_request_threaded_irq(device, dev->irq, dpc_irq, >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c >>> index 50a9522..f2139a1 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c >>> @@ -256,7 +256,8 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev) >>> */ >>> if (pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DPC) && >>> pci_aer_available() && >>> - (pcie_ports_dpc_native || (services & PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER))) >>> + (pcie_ports_dpc_native || host->native_dpc || >>> + (services & PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER))) >>> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC; >>> >>> if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM || >>>