linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	kbusch@kernel.org
Cc: mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, terry.bowman@amd.com,
	tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:48:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f6c49d5-e11e-488b-bb67-4051abcb02f4@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <362fcb01-8d9c-49e6-be83-5a784c1e5f3e@linux.alibaba.com>



在 2025/3/17 14:02, Shuai Xue 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2025/3/3 12:33, Shuai Xue 写道:
>>
>>
>> 在 2025/3/3 11:43, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 写道:
>>>
>>> On 2/16/25 6:42 PM, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>>> The AER driver has historically avoided reading the configuration space of
>>>> an endpoint or RCiEP that reported a fatal error, considering the link to
>>>> that device unreliable. Consequently, when a fatal error occurs, the AER
>>>> and DPC drivers do not report specific error types, resulting in logs like:
>>>>
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: EDR: EDR event received
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x0005 source:0x3400
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: DPC: ERR_FATAL detected
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
>>>>    nvme nvme0: frozen state error detected, reset controller
>>>>    nvme 0000:34:00.0: ready 0ms after DPC
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: AER: broadcast slot_reset message
>>>>
>>>> AER status registers are sticky and Write-1-to-clear. If the link recovered
>>>> after hot reset, we can still safely access AER status of the error device.
>>>> In such case, report fatal errors which helps to figure out the error root
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> After this patch, the logs like:
>>>>
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: EDR: EDR event received
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: DPC: containment event, status:0x0005 source:0x3400
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: DPC: ERR_FATAL detected
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: AER: broadcast error_detected message
>>>>    nvme nvme0: frozen state error detected, reset controller
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: waiting 100 ms for downstream link, after activation
>>>>    nvme 0000:34:00.0: ready 0ms after DPC
>>>>    nvme 0000:34:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrectable (Fatal), type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
>>>>    nvme 0000:34:00.0:   device [144d:a804] error status/mask=00000010/00504000
>>>>    nvme 0000:34:00.0:    [ 4] DLP                    (First)
>>>>    pcieport 0000:30:03.0: AER: broadcast slot_reset message
>>>
>>> IMO, above info about device error details is more of a debug info. Since the
>>> main use of this info use to understand more details about the recovered
>>> DPC error. So I think is better to print with debug tag. Lets see what others
>>> think.
>>>
>>> Code wise, looks fine to me.
>>
>> thanks, looking forward to more feedback.
>>>
>>>
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> Gentle ping.
> 
> Thanks.
> Shuai
> 


Hi, all,
  
Gentle ping.
  
Thanks.
Shuai


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-24 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-17  2:42 [PATCH v4 0/3] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-02-17  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2025-02-17  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2025-03-03  3:36   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-03-03  3:48     ` Shuai Xue
2025-06-12 10:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-19  6:28     ` Shuai Xue
2025-02-17  2:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-03-03  3:43   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-03-03  4:33     ` Shuai Xue
2025-03-17  6:02       ` Shuai Xue
2025-04-24 11:48         ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2025-06-12 10:46     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-03  2:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f6c49d5-e11e-488b-bb67-4051abcb02f4@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).