From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Neuling To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Subject: Re: Build fail in hugetlbpage.c with linux-next and mpc85xx_defconfig In-reply-to: References: <14174.1329347321@neuling.org> <16098.1329349063@neuling.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:01:28 +1100 Message-ID: <8058.1329368488@neuling.org> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message you wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: > >> > Becky, > >> > > >> > This has been broken in linux-next for a while. =3DA0Looks like a merge > >> > issue but you were the last to touch it... > >> > > >> > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'reserve_hugetlb_gpages': > >> > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:313: error: passing argument 5 of 'parse= > _ar=3D > >> gs' makes integer from pointer without a cast > >> > include/linux/moduleparam.h:317: note: expected 's16' but argument is = > of =3D > >> type 'int (*)(char *, char *)' > >> > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:313: error: too few arguments to functio= > n '=3D > >> parse_args' > >> > >> A suggest fix has been submitted. > > > > Do you have a link? =A0Which tree is it going in? > > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2012-February/095903.html > > I just sent it. I'm not sure who would pick this up. Ideally it would > go in the next release. I think that's a different problem, as that's already in next. sfr posted where problem patch is Mikey