From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403151120080.4038@acs.sysgo.com>
References: <20040118122134.GA4994@iliana> <20040119152954.GD13454@stop.crashing.org> <20040119154758.GA23038@iliana> <20040119155801.GF13454@stop.crashing.org> <20040119163857.GB23613@iliana> <20040119164849.GG13454@stop.crashing.org> <20040119170741.GA23943@iliana> <20040119172251.GH13454@stop.crashing.org> <20040119173000.GA24440@iliana> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401191839350.551@waterleaf.sonytel.be> <20040119174950.GA24764@iliana> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401191852470.551@waterleaf.sonytel.be> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403151120080.4038@acs.sysgo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <812B9EB8-7714-11D8-A105-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com>
Cc: Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: linuxppc latest ?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:38:15 -0600
To: Armin Schindler <armin.schindler@sysgo.com>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Mar 15, 2004, at 4:31 AM, Armin Schindler wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm somehow confused with the status of linuxppc.
>
> If I want to patch my 2.4.25 kernel, what should I do to have the
> latest linuxppc code ?
>
> penguinppc.org tells me to use bitkeeper's linuxppc-2.4, but this tree
> seems to be incomplete (directory arch/ppc/8260_io is missing).
> Even together with the main linux-2.4 tree, some features I know from
> the "old" snapshots are missing.

The the arch/ppc/8260_io dir has been renamed to cpm2_io.

- kumar


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/