linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel 0/3 REPOST] vfio-pci: Add support for mmapping MSI-X table
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:06:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82b2e63c-0a39-303c-f255-b857764fc412@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622151118.0006c3d3@w520.home>

On 23/06/17 07:11, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:48:42 +1000
> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Here is a patchset which Yongji was working on before
>> leaving IBM LTC. Since we still want to have this functionality
>> in the kernel (DPDK is the first user), here is a rebase
>> on the current upstream.
>>
>>
>> Current vfio-pci implementation disallows to mmap the page
>> containing MSI-X table in case that users can write directly
>> to MSI-X table and generate an incorrect MSIs.
>>
>> However, this will cause some performance issue when there
>> are some critical device registers in the same page as the
>> MSI-X table. We have to handle the mmio access to these
>> registers in QEMU emulation rather than in guest.
>>
>> To solve this issue, this series allows to expose MSI-X table
>> to userspace when hardware enables the capability of interrupt
>> remapping which can ensure that a given PCI device can only
>> shoot the MSIs assigned for it. And we introduce a new bus_flags
>> PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP to test this capability on PCI side
>> for different archs.
>>
>> The patch 3 are based on the proposed patchset[1].
>>
>> Changelog
>> v3:
>> - rebased on the current upstream
> 
> There's something not forthcoming here, the last version I see from
> Yongji is this one:
> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-June/017245.html
> 
> Which was a 6-patch series where patches 2-4 tried to apply
> PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP for cases that supported other platforms.  That
> doesn't exist here, so it's not simply a rebase.  Patch 1/ seems to
> equate this new flag to the IOMMU capability IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP, but
> nothing is done here to match them together.  That patch also mentions
> the work Eric has done for similar features on ARM, but again those
> patches are dropped.  It seems like an incomplete feature now.  Thanks,


Thanks! I suspected this is not the latest but could not find anything
better than we use internally for tests, and I could not reach Yongji for
comments whether this was the latest update.

As I am reading the patches, I notice that the "msi remap" term is used all
over the place. While this remapping capability may be the case for x86/arm
(and therefore the IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP flag makes sense), powernv does not
do remapping but provides hardware isolation. When we are allowing MSIX BAR
mapping to the userspace - the isolation is what we really care about. Will
it make sense to rename PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP to
PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_ISOLATED ?

Another thing - the patchset enables PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP when IOMMU
just advertises IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP, not necessarily uses it, should the
patchset actually look at something like irq_remapping_enabled in
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c instead?



> 
> Alex
> 
>> v2:
>> - Make the commit log more clear
>> - Replace pci_bus_check_msi_remapping() with pci_bus_msi_isolated()
>>   so that we could clearly know what the function does
>> - Set PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP in pci_create_root_bus() instead
>>   of iommu_bus_notifier()
>> - Reserve VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_CAPS when we allow to mmap MSI-X
>>   table so that we can know whether we allow to mmap MSI-X table
>>   in QEMU
>>
>> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel%40vger.kernel.org/msg1138820.html
>>
>>
>> This is based on sha1
>> 63f700aab4c1 Linus Torvalds "Merge tag 'xtensa-20170612' of git://github.com/jcmvbkbc/linux-xtensa".
>>
>> Please comment. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yongji Xie (3):
>>   PCI: Add a new PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP flag
>>   pci-ioda: Set PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP for IODA host bridge
>>   vfio-pci: Allow to expose MSI-X table to userspace if interrupt
>>     remapping is enabled
>>
>>  include/linux/pci.h                       |  1 +
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c |  8 ++++++++
>>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c               | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c          |  3 ++-
>>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
> 


-- 
Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-23  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-15  5:48 [PATCH kernel 0/3 REPOST] vfio-pci: Add support for mmapping MSI-X table Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-06-15  5:48 ` [PATCH kernel 1/3] PCI: Add a new PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP flag Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-06-15  5:48 ` [PATCH kernel 2/3] pci-ioda: Set PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP for IODA host bridge Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-06-15  9:25   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-15 10:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-06-15  5:48 ` [PATCH kernel 3/3] vfio-pci: Allow to expose MSI-X table to userspace if interrupt remapping is enabled Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-06-22 21:11 ` [PATCH kernel 0/3 REPOST] vfio-pci: Add support for mmapping MSI-X table Alex Williamson
2017-06-23  5:06   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2017-06-23 15:17     ` Alex Williamson
2017-06-28  7:27       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-06-29 20:06         ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82b2e63c-0a39-303c-f255-b857764fc412@ozlabs.ru \
    --to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=elohimes@gmail.com \
    --cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).