From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11F4C2BBCA for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=MKJcxPLG; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=X7nAgy7B; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W5CNR1dvrz3c6n for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:53:27 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=MKJcxPLG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=X7nAgy7B; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de (client-ip=103.168.172.147; helo=fout4-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=arnd@arndb.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from fout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W5CMf6YMgz3bNs for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:52:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B795513801A0; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:52:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:52:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1718963564; x=1719049964; bh=WMGDo/weqH B9YDWLlQD6sLBRrGER7ScpjCWRSqIRAJU=; b=MKJcxPLGgvmkBY+j/HTLZjZ8KI pvGXw459FAlanf7Ac5v5b80QkLQF8xlXMpxYpBvx4w9U/JqBjy+WLg42sp2LCoU7 Q1b7sVY0U9atF6syLC4XY52fNn0nDOmK/ZAU1NPDw3Ole9FWcIKsJ3WhrUSbjS0O i2l2ZiXzugEyGrEBwdm3cuJRW2BdSaCh9EPr80/iCCtKcq6Na1X7f0bajgjej8Tx FitYQuzmPjk0hPwNzDjYuPI+Yp1cAv/YSHWqMQzL0+ow//AxFir6unBR1Xx43VMt sTtOJWUxx7oJFStml4ol1MIfUqgzo4a50v7aYyXLtepLNGOKd3V6UG9I95kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1718963564; x=1719049964; bh=WMGDo/weqHB9YDWLlQD6sLBRrGER 7ScpjCWRSqIRAJU=; b=X7nAgy7BTqyAvR65qflUPcwaq1L6pXZMoo47rxn9ZM3V sKDdHt5wvqDbT5sa14aR9hCMiL0oj6CvWrv8SKMrJq40IWWOWM8MbFp61EphmqmA GCBih7Z83pGEIOJtdrxEY58EcLZTCfr3LtYlO5Bk5HkZc4y2HUPbxdUUvLm78WWR 6tuoSmWxlD/uu2pPsgmL8g2dFZKC0Xt/QAcoFkPreb180QnAWGYkaopwGC6yCFEm /Z+Br4e5r/bgM/ZXXRokPJT4v4p+Ba0c7m4Kpk7n6XdiBc6ZZ4ATNt57/k27/Yh7 tkRb7e0hgdJYE6Yo5pJL5NM0EiwSlMy6buj3koNHsA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefgedgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D8547B6008D; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:52:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-522-ga39cca1d5-fm-20240610.002-ga39cca1d MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <83613d85-53f9-4644-be68-4f438abe2e52@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240620162316.3674955-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20240620162316.3674955-8-arnd@kernel.org> <1537113c4396cd043a08a72bdca80cccfa2d54d9.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:52:23 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , "Helge Deller" , "Arnd Bergmann" , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark implementation Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , Andreas Larsson , guoren , Christophe Leroy , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , "Naveen N. Rao" , Heiko Carstens , "musl@lists.openwall.com" , Nicholas Piggin , Alexander Viro , LTP List , Brian Cain , Christian Brauner , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Xi Ruoyao , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Adhemerval Zanella Netto , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 11:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever >> is left in the end. I mainly want to ensure we can get all the bugfixes >> done for v6.10 so I can build my longer cleanup series on top of it >> for 6.11. > > This series is still for 6.10? Yes, these are all the bugfixes that I think we want to backport to stable kernels, so it makes sense to merge them as quickly as possible. The actual stuff I'm working on will come as soon as I have it in a state for public review and won't need to be backported. Arnd