From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4C7C43217 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NNNtZ3y2Qz3f9t for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 04:51:50 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=arinc9.com header.i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=zmail header.b=Sxoe6pf0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arinc9.com (client-ip=136.143.188.14; helo=sender4-op-o14.zoho.com; envelope-from=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=arinc9.com header.i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=zmail header.b=Sxoe6pf0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sender4-op-o14.zoho.com (sender4-op-o14.zoho.com [136.143.188.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NNDdZ3v1Cz30R8 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:40:02 +1100 (AEDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669894669; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=QTQmm9pOeLgmKb8bWo/bk1tmntAG21CY8mqL5Y7GzMv84vMVC3VrVna9NzX1hngi7eK1jcFyuiSXXvVA9bOp7v2JNs+2P/yWem+qMtXkZfdIeULvLO4Rfg8yQmTObIt1kyNHO2k94mTkgHZvRKbMyIMAcRvOxm9qMfK6qb3t88g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1669894669; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=dfOEXnlaPDTQyh5hwojKntKZbR0Ct6BYQNOU/3518PU=; b=OYF7SwvD1mv3O+HAFCbq9CfMSGf7fvV73aJ926EunEgVq/bUTdRUCCmRrZD9+8rTw9wNG3PDjimgO76TJJ6VPC/P/vttun+Obu5Dzyp0sS31x9L5iYLvG+rdO6kZvZ2wtK6Gn86PgqwwiOO9sfMtbOWsOMExVMcejf44MYA+nAo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=arinc9.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1669894669; s=zmail; d=arinc9.com; i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Subject:To:To:Cc:Cc:References:From:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=dfOEXnlaPDTQyh5hwojKntKZbR0Ct6BYQNOU/3518PU=; b=Sxoe6pf0viFvg95RBI3wMeoXYd0syHO9a0cEcwxKEbUeNP5X1PyRVz24a8qLfztM cNOs3+XlOAmEYW4Cspyrx9xPr6rdVmINXwU/r6bTSOpPefuylQ7S/DIWSUhazWPCj3l ohbSEg1Td2+qDT3JhrnQZaDjIZ9aCibjEQyIlKI4= Received: from [10.10.10.3] (37.120.152.236 [37.120.152.236]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1669894667415837.5294444284028; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 03:37:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <83ed1490-4d87-98c5-2616-54b5f1ab64b7@arinc9.com> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:37:31 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding To: Michael Ellerman , Andrew Lunn References: <20221130141040.32447-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <32638470-b074-3b14-bfb2-10b49307b9e3@arinc9.com> <877czbs8w7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= In-Reply-To: <877czbs8w7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 04:43:21 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Heiko Stuebner , Geert Uytterhoeven , Tim Harvey , Vladimir Oltean , Linus Walleij , Konrad Dybcio , Alexandre Torgue , Stefan Agner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Oleksij Rempel , Fabio Estevam , Peng Fan , Florian Fainelli , Samuel Holland , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Gregory Clement , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Russell King , Jernej Skrabec , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Sergio Paracuellos , Chen-Yu Tsai , Andy Gross , Broadcom internal kernel review list , NXP Linux Team , Ray Jui , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Sascha Hauer , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Coquelin , Frank Wunderlich , Hauke Mehrtens , Hans Ulli Kroll , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Nicholas Piggin , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, soc@kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , Scott Branden , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Rasmus Villemoes , Nicolas Ferre , "David S. Miller" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Shawn Guo , Claudiu Beznea , Michael Riesch Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 1.12.2022 13:42, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Arınç ÜNAL writes: >> On 30.11.2022 18:55, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:10:35PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>>> Hello folks, >>>> >>>> With this patch series, we're completely getting rid of 'label = "cpu";' >>>> which is not used by the DSA dt-binding at all. >>>> >>>> Information for taking the patches for maintainers: >>>> Patch 1: netdev maintainers (based off netdev/net-next.git main) >>>> Patch 2-3: SoC maintainers (based off soc/soc.git soc/dt) >>>> Patch 4: MIPS maintainers (based off mips/linux.git mips-next) >>>> Patch 5: PowerPC maintainers (based off powerpc/linux.git next-test) >>> >>> Hi Arınç >>> >>> So your plan is that each architecture maintainer merges one patch? >> >> Initially, I sent this series to soc@kernel.org to take it all but Rob >> said it must be this way instead. >> >>> >>> That is fine, but it is good to be explicit, otherwise patches will >>> fall through the cracks because nobody picks them up. I generally use >>> To: to indicate who i expect to merge a patch, and everybody else in >>> the Cc: >> >> Thanks for this, I'll follow suit if I don't see any activity for a few >> weeks. > > IMHO the best solution if the patches are truly independent is to send > them independantly to each maintainer. That way there's no confusion > about whether someone else will take the series. > > It's also simpler for maintainers to apply a single standalone patch vs > pick a single patch from a larger series. I agree. I'll do that next time. Cheers. Arınç