From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EC1DDDF0 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:31:28 +1100 (EST) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so379856fgb.39 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:31:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: penberg@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20090217102733.GB26402@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090216172016.f1d159a7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090217005539.GA6292@x200.localdomain> <20090217102733.GB26402@wotan.suse.de> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:31:25 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020902170331m765c50d6xd792de14ac220b9d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: next-20090216: slqb From: Pekka Enberg To: Nick Piggin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:55:40AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> FYI, on powerpc-64-smp-n-debug-n: >> >> mm/slqb.c: In function '__slab_free': >> mm/slqb.c:1648: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_free_to_remote' >> mm/slqb.c: In function 'kmem_cache_open': >> mm/slqb.c:2174: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmem_cache_dyn_array_free' >> mm/slqb.c:2175: warning: label 'error_cpu_array' defined but not used >> mm/slqb.c: In function 'kmem_cache_destroy': >> mm/slqb.c:2294: error: implicit declaration of function 'claim_remote_free_list' >> mm/slqb.c: In function 'kmem_cache_reap_percpu': >> mm/slqb.c:2547: error: implicit declaration of function 'flush_remote_free_cache' >> mm/slqb.c: In function 'kmem_cache_init': >> mm/slqb.c:2783: error: 'per_cpu__kmem_cpu_nodes' undeclared (first use in this function) >> mm/slqb.c:2783: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >> mm/slqb.c:2783: error: for each function it appears in.) >> mm/slqb.c:2784: error: 'kmem_cpu_cache' undeclared (first use in this function) On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hmm, I guess this (SMP=n && NUMA=y) must be a valid config on ppc if > SLQB is the only one tripping on it, so I'll look at code to fix tihs > up. It would be nice if one of the ppc devs confirmed this, though. Other architectures don't seem to support the combination. Pekka