From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: hbathini@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com,
skb99@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 4/8] selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 11:37:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84353363810b8d63e7933391f5c6a2ea46f348e3.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
This patch enables arch specifier "__powerpc64" in verifier
selftest for ppc64. Power 32-bit would require separate
handling. Changes tested for 64-bit only.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index b0c441384f20..365008d1ed40 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@
#define __arch_riscv64 __arch("RISCV64")
#define __arch_s390x __arch("s390x")
#define __arch_loongarch __arch("LOONGARCH")
+#define __arch_powerpc64 __arch("POWERPC64")
#define __caps_unpriv(caps) __test_tag("test_caps_unpriv=" EXPAND_QUOTE(caps))
#define __load_if_JITed() __test_tag("load_mode=jited")
#define __load_if_no_JITed() __test_tag("load_mode=no_jited")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 3ce32d134e2c..01b1420097d2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ enum arch {
ARCH_RISCV64 = 0x8,
ARCH_S390X = 0x10,
ARCH_LOONGARCH = 0x20,
+ ARCH_POWERPC64 = 0x40,
};
static int get_current_arch(void)
@@ -392,6 +393,8 @@ static int get_current_arch(void)
return ARCH_S390X;
#elif defined(__loongarch__)
return ARCH_LOONGARCH;
+#elif defined(__powerpc64__)
+ return ARCH_POWERPC64;
#endif
return ARCH_UNKNOWN;
}
@@ -585,6 +588,8 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
arch = ARCH_S390X;
} else if (strcmp(val, "LOONGARCH") == 0) {
arch = ARCH_LOONGARCH;
+ } else if (strcmp(val, "POWERPC64") == 0) {
+ arch = ARCH_POWERPC64;
} else {
PRINT_FAIL("bad arch spec: '%s'\n", val);
err = -EINVAL;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:15 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:18 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:06 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 7:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:19 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-06 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar [this message]
2026-08-05 7:07 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:24 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] selftest/bpf: Add tailcall verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-05 7:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-06 17:26 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-05 6:07 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-06 17:27 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84353363810b8d63e7933391f5c6a2ea46f348e3.1785906979.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--to=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox