From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, willy@infradead.org,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [v6 05/15] mm: don't accessed uninitialized struct pages
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8444cb2b-b134-e9fc-a458-1ba7b22a8df1@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170811093746.GF30811@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 08/11/2017 05:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 07-08-17 16:38:39, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>> In deferred_init_memmap() where all deferred struct pages are initialized
>> we have a check like this:
>>
>> if (page->flags) {
>> VM_BUG_ON(page_zone(page) != zone);
>> goto free_range;
>> }
>>
>> This way we are checking if the current deferred page has already been
>> initialized. It works, because memory for struct pages has been zeroed, and
>> the only way flags are not zero if it went through __init_single_page()
>> before. But, once we change the current behavior and won't zero the memory
>> in memblock allocator, we cannot trust anything inside "struct page"es
>> until they are initialized. This patch fixes this.
>>
>> This patch defines a new accessor memblock_get_reserved_pfn_range()
>> which returns successive ranges of reserved PFNs. deferred_init_memmap()
>> calls it to determine if a PFN and its struct page has already been
>> initialized.
>
> Why don't we simply check the pfn against pgdat->first_deferred_pfn?
Because we are initializing deferred pages, and all of them have pfn
greater than pgdat->first_deferred_pfn. However, some of deferred pages
were already initialized if they were reserved, in this path:
mem_init()
free_all_bootmem()
free_low_memory_core_early()
for_each_reserved_mem_region()
reserve_bootmem_region()
init_reserved_page() <- if this is deferred reserved page
__init_single_pfn()
__init_single_page()
So, currently, we are using the value of page->flags to figure out if
this page has been initialized while being part of deferred page, but
this is not going to work for this project, as we do not zero the memory
that is backing the struct pages, and size the value of page->flags can
be anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-11 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 20:38 [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 01/15] x86/mm: reserve only exiting low pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-17 15:37 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 02/15] x86/mm: setting fields in deferred pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:32 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 03/15] sparc64/mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:32 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 9:50 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-11 15:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:22 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:35 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 19:00 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 05/15] mm: don't accessed uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:55 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2017-08-14 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:51 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:28 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-15 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 06/15] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 07/15] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:58 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 08/15] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:03 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 09/15] sparc64: optimized struct page zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:04 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 10/15] x86/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 11/15] arm64/kasan: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-08 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 11:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 12:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 12:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 13:15 ` David Laight
2017-08-08 13:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 12/15] mm: explicitly zero pagetable memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 13/15] mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:11 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 14/15] mm: optimize early system hash allocations Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 15/15] mm: debug for raw alloctor Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:18 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 14:01 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-15 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 7:58 ` [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8444cb2b-b134-e9fc-a458-1ba7b22a8df1@oracle.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).