From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Yoder Stuart-B08248" <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:51:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84d1a438a79cd64e73f7d6c7b63a8706@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A5968F@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net>
>>> If this is a one-off situation it doesn't warrant a new
>>> general property. However, if it becomes common enough
>>> a simpler representation will benefit developers.
>>
>> Sure. But in that case, it would be a lot better to
>> try to come up with something new that can handle the
>> general case (or many many more cases at least).
>
> What is the general case you are referring to here?
Anything else that currently needs an interrupt nexus
where there is no existing device node to put it in.
> What
> other cases and scenarios can you imagine?
Anything else that currently needs an interrupt nexus
where there is no existing device node to put it in.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 23:25 [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property Stuart Yoder
2007-02-22 0:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-22 1:18 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 7:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 10:34 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 11:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 15:47 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 17:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 19:15 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 21:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 21:57 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 22:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 4:16 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 5:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 13:08 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 14:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 2:32 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 2:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 3:45 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 11:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 0:40 ` David Gibson
2007-02-28 1:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-26 16:53 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 22:57 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 0:33 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:07 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 16:14 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-23 17:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 17:01 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 17:51 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-02-22 22:48 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 7:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84d1a438a79cd64e73f7d6c7b63a8706@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).