linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
To: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
	Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/rtas: rename va_rtas_call_unlocked() to va_rtas_call()
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:17:59 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84edcbaacd87e84997cd77664048799a3f93d169.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230220-rtas-queue-for-6-4-v1-5-010e4416f13f@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 15:33 -0600, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The function name va_rtas_call_unlocked() is confusing: it may be
> called with or without rtas_lock held. Rename it to va_rtas_call().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>

Not a huge fan of the name, the va_ suggests that the only difference
between this function and rtas_call() is the varargs handling. Perhaps
something like __rtas_call()?

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> index c29c38b1a55a..96a10a0abe3a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
> @@ -996,9 +996,8 @@ static void __init init_error_log_max(void) {}
>  #endif
>  
>  
> -static void
> -va_rtas_call_unlocked(struct rtas_args *args, int token, int nargs,
> int nret,
> -                     va_list list)
> +static void va_rtas_call(struct rtas_args *args, int token, int
> nargs, int nret,
> +                        va_list list)
>  {
>         int i;
>  
> @@ -1038,7 +1037,7 @@ void rtas_call_unlocked(struct rtas_args *args,
> int token, int nargs, int nret,
>         va_list list;
>  
>         va_start(list, nret);
> -       va_rtas_call_unlocked(args, token, nargs, nret, list);
> +       va_rtas_call(args, token, nargs, nret, list);
>         va_end(list);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1138,7 +1137,7 @@ int rtas_call(int token, int nargs, int nret,
> int *outputs, ...)
>         args = &rtas_args;
>  
>         va_start(list, outputs);
> -       va_rtas_call_unlocked(args, token, nargs, nret, list);
> +       va_rtas_call(args, token, nargs, nret, list);
>         va_end(list);
>  
>         /* A -1 return code indicates that the last command couldn't
> 

-- 
Andrew Donnellan    OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com   IBM Australia Limited

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-23  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 21:33 [PATCH 0/8] RTAS changes for 6.4 Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/rtas: ensure 8-byte alignment for struct rtas_args Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  4:00   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/rtas: use memmove for potentially overlapping buffer copy Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  4:09   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc/rtas: rtas_call_unlocked() kerneldoc Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  4:15   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/rtas: fix miswording in rtas_function kerneldoc Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  0:17   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/rtas: rename va_rtas_call_unlocked() to va_rtas_call() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  4:17   ` Andrew Donnellan [this message]
2023-03-23 16:11     ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-29 12:24   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/rtas: lockdep annotations Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  6:01   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/rtas: warn on unsafe argument to rtas_call_unlocked() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  4:25   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-23 12:17     ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-24  0:56       ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-29 12:20         ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-29 16:23           ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-06 21:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/rtas: consume retry statuses in sys_rtas() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-03-23  6:26   ` Andrew Donnellan
2023-03-23 19:39     ` Nathan Lynch
2023-03-23  9:44   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-03-23 13:40     ` Nathan Lynch
2024-01-25 15:55   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-01-25 16:33     ` Nathan Lynch
2024-01-25 16:46       ` Christophe Leroy
2024-01-25 17:23         ` Nathan Lynch
2023-04-06  1:09 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/8] RTAS changes for 6.4 Michael Ellerman
2023-04-26 12:12 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84edcbaacd87e84997cd77664048799a3f93d169.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).