From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208C9DDF1D for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 01:04:42 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200705141637.19572.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20070514075415.7999BDDEC8@ozlabs.org> <200705141637.19572.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <850bd1e3d0b6c5e23a2fe43154591fd9@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Rewrite IO allocation & mapping on powerpc64 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:04:02 +0200 To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Do you think it's ok to not treat the range between 64k and 1M special? > There might be ISA drivers that expect devices in there. ISA I/O space is 16-bit addressing only. > Maybe we should > start PHB_IO_BASE after a 1M guard area where nothing is mapped. This can cause problems, many PCI bridges and devices don't decode all 32 bits of the legacy I/O address space. > Where should Olof's PCMCIA space go? The ISA or the PHB range? It uses the legacy IDE I/O addresses, so it needs to go to the 64kB space. It isn't ISA though. Segher